Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 43.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 426 Words, 2,565 Characters
Page Size: 610 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39632/3.pdf

Download Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware ( 43.9 kB)


Preview Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware
, ‘ Case 1 :08-cr-00011-GIVIS Document 3 Filed O1/22/2008 Page 1 of 2 , _ _
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintifi )
) . . .
v. ) Criminal Action N0. 08- //
)
TYE ANDERSON, )
)
Defendant. ) F I
INDICTMENT JAN 2 2 QGG3
The Grand Jtny for the District of Delaware charges that ____ _.i
U.S. DiSTRlCT COURT
DlSElCT OF DELAWARE
COUNT I
From in or around July 2005, and continuing to on or about March 9, 2006, in the State
and District of Delaware and elsewhere, Tye Anderson, defendant herein, did knowingly conspire
with persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury to distribute, and to possess with the intent
to distribute, a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of heroin, a Schedule I
narcotic controlled substance, a violation of Title 2l, United States Code, Sections 84l(a)(l) and
84l(b)(l)(C).
All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846.

F Case 1 :08-cr-00011-GIVIS Document 3 Filed O1/22/2008 Page 2 of 2 , _
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE
Upon conviction of one of more ofthe controlled substances offenses alleged in Count I
of this Information, defendant Tye Anderson shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to 21
U.S.C. § 853 any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly,
as a result ofthe said violations and any property used, in any manner or part, to commit or to
facilitate tlre commission ofthe said violations. U
If any ofthe above described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendant:
(a) emot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(e) has been cornmingled with other property which cannot be divided with difficulty;
it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other
property of said defendant up to the value ofthe forfeitable property described above.
All in accordance with Title 21, United States Code, Sections 853 & 881, and Rule
32.2(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
A TRUE BILL:
r~erepersE{r——_—-_———_nm
COLM F. CONNOLLY
United States Attorney
By:
Robert F. Kravetz
Assistant United States Attorney
Dated: January 22, 2008

Case 1:08-cr-00011-GMS

Document 3

Filed 01/22/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:08-cr-00011-GMS

Document 3

Filed 01/22/2008

Page 2 of 2