Free Stipulation and Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

y A - Case 1 :08-cv-00010-JJF Document 7 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 1 of 3
l
1 .
1 __ F I LE D p
1 UNITED STATES 1
1 Al_EL1CI_l,`?`·¥“` FE U" Wi Y "`(‘
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IA M U g grim
l FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW IVIEXICO `I M 1 I I ‘
) ‘ c Y KM AN
MARY CANDELARIA and UNITED FOOD ) H EW J ` D
AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, ) CLERK
LOCAL 1564, on behalf of themselves and all )
others similarly situated, )
) Civil Action No. 07-1186 JB—WPL
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. )
)
INTEL CORPORATION, )
)
Defendant. )
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO PLAIN TIFFS’ COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs MARY CANDELARIA and UNITED
FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 1564 in the above-styled action
alleges that Intel monopolized the worldwide market for x86 microprocessors and contains
allegations that are largely identical to those in the other Complaints and in the First Amended
Consolidated Complaint filed in MDL No. 05-1717 pending in the United States District Court
for the District of Delaware by the plaintiffs named therein ("C1ass Plaintiffs") on April 28,
2006;
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2007, based on those similarities, Class Plaintiffs tiled a
notice with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation identifying the above-styled action as a
tag-along action to MDL No. 05-1717;
WHEREAS, no party objected to the transfer of the above-styled action to MDL No. 05-
1717 with the 15-day period permitted under Rule 7.4(c), Rules of Procedure of the Judicial
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which period expired on December 13, 2007;

L ‘ Case 1 :O8—cv-OOO10—JJF Document 7 Filed O1/O3/2008 Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2007, Class Plaintiffs in MDL No. 05-1717 and Defendant
Intel Corporation tiled a stipulation in the MDL Court that sets forth the treatment of the above-
styled action once the transfer of this action to the MDL Court by the Judicial Panel for
Multidistrict Litigation is complete, including a stipulation that Intel’s Answer to the First
Amended Consolidated Complaint filed in MDL No. 05-1717 shall be deemed a complete
response to the Plaintiffs’ Complaint in the above-styled action;
WHEREAS, Intel’s response to the Complaint in the above-styled action is currently due
December 18, 2007;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, and subject to the
Order of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint
filed by MARY CANDELARIA and UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS
UNION, LOCAL 1564, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, is extended to
February 18, 2008.
YOUTZ & VALDEZ, P.C. BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP
By/sl Shane Youtz By: ls! Richard A. Ripley
Shane C. Youtz Richard A. Ripley
Brandt Milstein 2020 K Street, N.W.
900 Gold Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20006
Albuquerque, NM 87102 (202) 373-6000 - Telephone
(505) 244-1200 - Telephone (505) 373-6001 — Facsimile
(505) 244-9700 - Facsimile [email protected]
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintgjfs Mary Candelaria Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation
And United Food And Commercial
Workers Union, Local 1564, on behabfof
themselves and all others similarly situated
-2-

1 - ' Case 1 :O8—cv-OOO10—JJF Document 7 Filed O1/O3/2008 Page 3 of 3
SO ORDERED, this day 0f "°°"`a'*" , 2007.
. J.

Case 1:08-cv-00010-JJF

Document 7

Filed 01/03/2008

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:08-cv-00010-JJF

Document 7

Filed 01/03/2008

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:08-cv-00010-JJF

Document 7

Filed 01/03/2008

Page 3 of 3