Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 21.0 kB
Pages: 6
Date: September 6, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,044 Words, 7,035 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39439/4.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware ( 21.0 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00813-GMS

Document 4

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

BRIE DREW,

: : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CORPORATION SERVICE CO., INC. : a Delaware corporation, : : Defendant. : ___________________________________ :

Civil Action No. 07-813 GMS

DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendant Corporation Service Company (incorrectly identified in the caption of the Complaint as "Corporation Service Co., Inc.") ("CSC" or "Company" or "Defendant"), by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby answers the Complaint of Plaintiff Brie Drew ("Plaintiff") in the above-captioned matter by admitting, denying, and averring as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. Defendant admits that Plaintiff seeks damages under Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Defendant denies that facts exist that would allow Plaintiff to obtain relief pursuant to these laws. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. 3. 4. Admitted. Admitted. Admitted.

ME1 7031475v.1

Case 1:07-cv-00813-GMS

Document 4

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 2 of 5

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 5. The allegations contained in paragraph 5 constitute conclusions of law to

which no responsive pleading is required. a. Defendant admits only that Plaintiff filed a charge of discrimination that

bears the date of May 8, 2007. The remaining allegations constitute conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required. b. Defendant admits that the EEOC issued a notice of rights that bears the

date of September 19, 2007. c. Defendant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as

to the allegations contained in sub-paragraph 5(c), and therefore, denies the same. PARTIES 6. Paragraphs 1-5 above are incorporated by reference as if the same were fully

set forth herein. 7. Defendant admits that Plaintiff is an African-American female. Defendant

lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations concerning Plaintiff's current address. By way of further response, Defendant's business records reflect that Plaintiff's last known address was 1 Westbrook Drive, Unit F-108, Woolwich, NJ 08085. 8. 9. Admitted. Admitted. By way of further response, Defendant is a leading provider of

legal and financial services for many of the world's largest companies and law firms. CSC offers corporate compliance and governance services, intellectual property management and domain name management services, entity management services, public record document and retrieval services, uniform commercial code and motor vehicle titling services, litigation management, and registered agent services.

ME1 7031475v.1

Case 1:07-cv-00813-GMS

Document 4

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 3 of 5

10.

The allegations contained in paragraph 10 state conclusions of law to which no

responsive pleading is required. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 11. Paragraphs 1-10 above are incorporated by reference as if the same were fully

set forth herein. 12. 2006. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Admitted. Denied. Denied. Admitted. Denied. Denied. By way of further response, Plaintiff was hired on September 11,

Count I Violation Of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Disparate Treatment/Discriminatory Termination/Hostile Work Environment) 18. Paragraphs 1-17 above are incorporated by reference as if the same were fully

set forth herein. 19. 20. Denied. Denied. Count II Violation Of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Retaliation) 21. Paragraphs 1-20 above are incorporated by reference as if the same were fully

set forth herein. 22. Denied.

ME1 7031475v.1

Case 1:07-cv-00813-GMS

Document 4

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 4 of 5

Count III Violation Of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Disparate Treatment /Hostile Work Environment) 23. Paragraphs 1-22 above are incorporated by reference as if the same were fully

set forth herein. 24. Denied.

Defendant denies all allegations contained in the Wherefore Clause of the Complaint (including its sub-parts) and denies that it is liable to Plaintiff or any other individual for any reason or in any way. DEFENSES 1. To the extent that Plaintiff has failed to satisfy the statutory and/or

jurisdictional prerequisites to the institution of an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or under any other federal or statute, her claims fail. 2. To the extent that Plaintiff failed to satisfy the applicable statutes of

limitations and/or filing periods, her claims are barred. 3. To the extent that Plaintiff has failed to mitigate her damages, her claims for

damages are diminished or barred. 4. Defendant's employment decisions with respect to Plaintiff were made for

legitimate business reasons. 5. Defendant has in place a strong policy against discrimination and otherwise

exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any discrimination, and Plaintiff unreasonably failed to take advantage of preventive and corrective opportunities and procedures provided by Defendant or to avoid harm otherwise.

ME1 7031475v.1

Case 1:07-cv-00813-GMS

Document 4

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 5 of 5

6.

At all relevant times, Defendant has made good faith efforts to comply with

Title VII. Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages are barred by Defendant's adoption, publication and enforcement of a policy against discrimination of the type alleged in the Complaint. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS Defendant reserves the right to assert such additional defenses that may prove applicable during the course of this litigation.

Respectfully submitted,

January 7, 2008

/s/ Christopher A. Selzer Michael P. Kelly (DE ID# 2295) Christopher A. Selzer (DE ID# 4305) McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Renaissance Centre 405 N. King Street, 8th Floor P. O. Box 111 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 984-6300 Sarah E. Bouchard, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice Admission pending) Tara Patterson Hammons, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice Admission pending) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2921 (215) 963-5077/5477 Attorneys for Defendant

ME1 7031475v.1

Case 1:07-cv-00813-GMS

Document 4-2

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

: : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CORPORATION SERVICE CO., INC. : a Delaware corporation, : : Defendant. : ___________________________________ :

BRIE DREW,

Civil Action No. 07-813 GMS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 7, 2008, I electronically filed Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint of Plaintiff Brie Drew with the Clerk of the United States District Court using its CM/EMF system, which will then electronically notify the following CM/ECF participant on this case: John M. LaRosa, Esq. Two East 7th Street Suite 302 Wilmington, DE 19801-3707 /s/ Christopher A. Selzer Christopher A. Selzer (DE ID# 4305) McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Renaissance Centre 405 N. King Street, 8th Floor P. O. Box 111 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 984-6300 Counsel for Defendant Corporation Service Company

ME1 7031475v.1