Free Order of Detention - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cr-00156-GIVIS Document 9 Filed 11/O9/2007 Page 1 of 2
AO 472 (Rev. 3/86) Order of Detention Pending Trial
District of _ Delaware
UNTTED STATES OF AMERICA
V. ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
Robert S. Buckley Case -
Defendant M ·
In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing has been held. 1 conclude that the following facts require the
detention ofthe defendant pending trial in this case.
Part I—Findings of Fact
Q (1) The defendant is charged with an offense described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1) and has been convicted ofa Q federal offense Q state
or local offense that would have been a federal offense ifa circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed that is
Q a crime ofviolence as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).
Q an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.
Q an offense for which a maximum term ofimprisonment often years or more is prescribed in
>l<
Q a felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted oftwo or more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C.
§ 3142(f)(1)(A)-(C), or comparable state or local offenses.
Q (2) The offense described in finding (1) was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.
Q (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the Q date of conviction Q release ofthe defendant from imprisonment
for the offense described in Ending (1).
Q (4) Findings Nos. (1), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the
safety of (an) other person(s) and the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.
Alternative Findings (A)
(1) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense
for which a maximum term of imprisonment often years or more is prescribed in .
Q under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).
Q (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding l that no condition or combination ofconditions will reasonably assure
the appearance ofthe defendant as required and the safety ofthe community.
Alternative Findings (B)
(1) There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear.
(2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another person or the community.
Part II——Written Statement of Reasons for Detention
1 find that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by clear and convincing evidence a prepon-
derance ofthe evidence: Defendant was detained because there are no conditions or combination thereof that will reasonable assure his
appearance as requred and the safety ofthe community. Defendant is charged with child porn offense for which the rebuttable presumption applies.
Defendant has not rebutted that presumption and the evidence against defendant is substantial in support ofthe offense, which supports the issue
of danger to the community. ln addition,
1. Defendant is a self-described cocaine addict.
2. Defendant has not present employment. l-le lost employment with the Boy Scouts before his arrest for failure to attend meetings and absenteeism
which shows a lack of responsibility.
3. Although defendant maintains that he can live with his mother, he was living with her when he obtained. received, possessed child porn.
4. His mental condition is poor- depression and anxiety.
l__"_` "`_ ;i———·-·—--
l F I L t D

i
Q a
* [ Z_I . Fi {
I .‘¤ .
7 I
l ; .--._-. l
l li`.? ?=.$i¤T.'CT ·1TC;·¥Jril
__" D15.--F'i!Tl {if ill L.1`i‘·‘A?E

Case 1 :07-cr-00156-GIVIS Document 9 Filed 11/O9/2007 Page 2 of 2
% AO 472 (Rev. 3/86) Order of Detention Pending Trial
Part III—Directi0ns Regarding Detention
The defendant is committed to the custody ofthe Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate,
to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a
reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel, On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the
Government, the person in charge ofthe corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in
connection with a court proceeding. .
November 9, 2007 I 2 I
Date Signet rare 0f./udicml O' ce
Mary Pat Thynge, Magistrate Judge
Name and Title of./udicial Ojicer
*1nsert as applicable: (a) Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 ez seq.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. § 951 ez
seq.); or (c) Section 1 ofAct ofSept. 15, 1980 (2] U.S.C. § 955a).

Case 1:07-cr-00156-GMS

Document 9

Filed 11/09/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00156-GMS

Document 9

Filed 11/09/2007

Page 2 of 2