Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 7

CLOSED, CV, PATENT, PHV

U.S. District Court U.S.District Court Minnesota (DMN) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:07-cv-02198-JMR-FLN

Secure Computing Corporation v. Finjan Software Ltd et al Assigned to: Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum Referred to: Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel Cause: 35:183 Patent Infringement Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation

Date Filed: 05/04/2007 Date Terminated: 08/16/2007 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 830 Patent Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by Christopher A Seidl Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP 800 LaSalle Ave Ste 2800 Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 612-349-8468 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jacob M Holdreith Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP 800 LaSalle Ave Ste 2800 Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 612-349-8500 Fax: 612-339-4181 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ronald J Schutz Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP 800 LaSalle Ave Ste 2800 Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 612-349-8500 Fax: 612-339-4181 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Trevor J Foster Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP 800 LaSalle Ave Ste 2800 Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 612-349-0859 Fax: 612-339-4181 Email: [email protected]

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 7

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Finjan Software Ltd represented by James R Hannah Perkins Coie LLP 101 Jefferson Dr Menlo Park, CA 94025 650-838-4307 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Lisa Kobialka Perkins Coie LLP 101 Jefferson Dr Menlo Park, CA 94025 650-838-4447 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Meghan Ashley Wharton Perkins Coie LLP 101 Jefferson Dr Menlo Park, CA 94025 650-838-4363 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul Joseph Andre Perkins Coie LLP 101 Jefferson Dr Menlo Park, CA 94025 650-838-4370 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Rachel K Zimmerman Merchant & Gould 80 S 8th St Ste 3200 Mpls, MN 55402 (612) 332-5300 Fax: (612) 332-9081 Email: [email protected]

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 7

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Anthony R Zeuli Merchant & Gould PC 80 S 8th St Ste 3200 Mpls, MN 55402 612-332-5300 Fax: 612-332-9081 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Finjan Software, Inc. represented by James R Hannah (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Lisa Kobialka (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Meghan Ashley Wharton (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul Joseph Andre (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Rachel K Zimmerman (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Anthony R Zeuli (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 05/04/2007

#

Docket Text 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all defendants ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 12925.) assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Patent List referred to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham, filed by Secure Computing Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (dch) QC'd by gjs. (Entered: 05/04/2007)

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 7

05/04/2007 05/04/2007

Summons Issued as to Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (dch) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Secure Computing Corporation that there is no such parent or publicly held corporation to report. (dch) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 3 ORDER OF DISQUALIFICATION. Patrick J. Schiltz recused and Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham no longer assigned to case. Case reassigned to Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum and Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel for all further proceedings. The new case number is 07cv2198 JMR/FLN. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 5/7/07. (JME) (Entered: 05/07/2007) Summons Reissued as to Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (akl) (Entered: 05/09/2007) 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Secure Computing Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (Holdreith, Jacob) (Entered: 05/24/2007) 5 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/11/2007) 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/14/2007) 7 AMENDED NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue: Motion Hearing set for 8/14/2007 09:00 AM in Minneapolis - Courtroom 15E before Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/14/2007) 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc. re 7 Amended Notice of Hearing on Motion, 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/14/2007) 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/29/2007) 10 Declaration of Ezra Sofer in Support of 9 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/29/2007) 11 Declaration of Anthony R. Zeuli in Support of 9 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A# 2 Exhibit(s) B# 3 Exhibit(s) C part 1# 4 Exhibit(s) C part 2# 5 Exhibit(s) C part 3# 6 Exhibit(s) C part 4# 7 Exhibit(s) D part 1# 8 Exhibit(s) D part 2# 9 Exhibit(s) D part 3)(Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/29/2007)

05/07/2007

05/09/2007 05/24/2007

06/11/2007 06/14/2007

06/14/2007

06/14/2007

06/29/2007

06/29/2007

06/29/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 7

06/29/2007

12 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc. of Finjan Software, Inc. as corporate parent and/or publicly held company. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/29/2007) 13 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Finjan Software, Inc. of Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO) as corporate parent and/or publicly held company. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/29/2007) 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc. re 9 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 12 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, 11 Declaration in Support,, 13 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, 10 Declaration in Support (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 06/29/2007) 15 STIPULATION PROTECTIVE ORDER by Secure Computing Corporation, Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Seidl, Christopher) (Entered: 07/23/2007) 16 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR: WILL REFILE. STIPULATION (Amended) Protective Order by Secure Computing Corporation, Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Seidl, Christopher) Modified text on 7/24/2007 (kt). (Entered: 07/24/2007) 17 STIPULATION (Amended) Protective Order by Secure Computing Corporation, Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Seidl, Christopher) (Entered: 07/24/2007) 18 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Paul Joseph Andre by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 07/24/2007) 19 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Lisa Kobialka by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 07/24/2007) 20 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for James R. Hannah by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 07/24/2007) 21 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Meghan Ashley Wharton by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Zeuli, Anthony) (Entered: 07/24/2007) 22 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on July 24, 2007. (kl) (Entered: 07/24/2007) 23 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue [FILED UNDER SEAL] filed by Secure Computing Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Foster, Trevor) RECEIVED SEALED DOCUMENT ON 7/25/07 Modified on 7/30/2007 (GJS). (Entered: 07/25/2007)

06/29/2007

06/29/2007

07/23/2007

07/24/2007

07/24/2007

07/24/2007

07/24/2007

07/24/2007

07/24/2007

07/24/2007 07/25/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 7

07/25/2007

24 Declaration of Paul Hawes in Support of 23 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Secure Computing Corporation. (Foster, Trevor) (Entered: 07/25/2007) 25 AFFIDAVIT of Dale Ross in OPPOSITION TO 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Secure Computing Corporation. (Foster, Trevor) (Entered: 07/25/2007) 26 Declaration of Trevor J. Foster in Support of 23 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Secure Computing Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Exs A thru G# 2 Exhibit(s) Exs H thru N# 3 Exhibit(s) Ex O, part 1# 4 Exhibit(s) Ex O, part 2# 5 Exhibit(s) Exs P thru Q# 6 Exhibit(s) Ex R, part 1# 7 Exhibit(s) Ex R, part 2# 8 Exhibit(s) Ex R, part 3# 9 Exhibit(s) Ex R, part 4# 10 Exhibit(s) Ex R, part 5# 11 Exhibit(s) Ex R, part 6# 12 Exhibit(s) Exs S thru V# 13 Placeholder for Exs W and X [Filed Under Seal])(Foster, Trevor) RECEIVED SEALED DOCUMENTS ON 7/25/07 Modified on 7/30/2007 (GJS). (Entered: 07/25/2007) 27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Secure Computing Corporation re 25 Affidavit in Opposition to Motion, 24 Declaration in Support, 26 Declaration in Support,,, 23 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion (Foster, Trevor) (Entered: 07/25/2007) TEXT ONLY ENTRY - ORDER granting 18,19,20,21 Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorneys Paul Joseph Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James R Hannah and Meghan Ashley Wharton for Finjan Software Ltd and Finjan Software, Inc. Fees paid; receipt numbers 4-014987 and 4014988. Approved by Clerk Richard D Sletten on 7/25/07. (MMC) (Entered: 07/27/2007) 28 Corrected Declaration of Trevor J. Foster in Support of 23 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Secure Computing Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Corrected Exhibit R Part 1 of 6 # 2 Corrected Exhibit R Part 2 of 6 # 3 Corrected Exhibit R Part 3 of 6 # 4 Corrected Exhibit R Part 4 of 6 # 5 Corrected Exhibit R Part 5 of 6 # 6 Exhibit(s) R Part 6 of 6)(Foster, Trevor) Modified text on 7/26/2007 (dch). (Entered: 07/26/2007) 29 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Secure Computing Corporation re 28 Declaration in Support, (Foster, Trevor) (Entered: 07/26/2007) 30 REPLY to Response to Motion re 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Zimmerman, Rachel) (Entered: 08/02/2007) 31 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc. re 30 Reply to Response to Motion (Zimmerman, Rachel) (Entered: 08/02/2007) 32 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel K Zimmerman on behalf of Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc. (Zimmerman, Rachel) (Entered:

07/25/2007

07/25/2007

07/25/2007

07/25/2007

07/26/2007

07/26/2007 08/02/2007

08/02/2007

08/03/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 7

08/03/2007) 08/03/2007 33 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Finjan Software Ltd, Finjan Software, Inc. re 32 Notice of Appearance Rachel K. Zimmerman (Zimmerman, Rachel) (Entered: 08/03/2007) ***TEXT ONLY ENTRY*** AMENDED NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue: Motion Hearing set for 8/14/2007 10:15 AM in Minneapolis Courtroom 15E before Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum. PLEASE NOTE CHANGE IN TIME ONLY(HLL) (Entered: 08/10/2007) 34 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum : Motion Hearing held on 8/14/2007 re 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue filed by Finjan Software Ltd and Finjan Software, Inc. Motion to Transfer Venue is granted. Order to be issued. (Court Reporter Dawn Hansen) (HLL) (Entered: 08/14/2007) 35 ORDER granting 6 Motion to Transfer Venue to District of Delaware. Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on August 15, 2007. (kl) (Entered: 08/16/2007) 36 LETTER from Clerk's Office to the District of Delaware regarding transfer. (dch) (Entered: 10/29/2007)

08/10/2007

08/14/2007

08/16/2007

10/29/2007

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
11/06/2007 07:37:50 PACER Login: Description: ud0037 Docket Report Client Code: Search Criteria: Cost: 0:07-cv-02198-JMRFLN 0.32

Billable Pages: 4

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-2

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FINJAN SOFTWARE LTD., and FINJAN SOFTWARE, INC., Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 07-CV-2198 JMR/FLN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DECLARATION OF TREVOR J. FOSTER AND EXHIBITS INDEX IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

I, TREVOR J. FOSTER, declare: 1. I am an associate with the law firm of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi

L.L.P., and am one of the attorneys representing plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation ("Secure"). 2. I submit this declaration and exhibit index in support of Secure's

Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue. 3. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. If called as a witness,

I could and would testify competently concerning these matters. 4. Secure has requested a six-month discovery extension in the pending

Delaware matter, Finjan Software Ltd. v. Secure Computing Corporation, et al. Case No.

1
MP3 20234667.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-2

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 5

06-369 (GMS) ("Delaware litigation"). Finjan opposes this extension and Secure intends on bringing this request to the Court. 5. As of this date, Finjan is producing its witnesses for depositions in the

Delaware litigation in California and Israel, not Delaware. 6. Secure Computing's counsel informed Finjan's counsel, Paul Andre, that it

had filed a complaint against Finjan in the District of Minnesota. Mr. Andre informed Secure Computing's counsel that he received authority from Finjan to accept service of the Minnesota complaint on behalf of Finjan. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Purchase Order

No. 29653 from Secure Computing. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a portion of the

box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the shipping label

on the box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the UPS tracking

information of the Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer box downloaded from the UPS website. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the return address

on an envelope contained in the box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer.

2
MP3 20234667.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-2

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 5

12.

Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy an excerpt from the

manual contained in the box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of a document

downloaded from Finjan's website titled "Finjan Vital SecurityTM Web Appliance Return Warranty," Version 1.1 dated February 2007. 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit H are true and correct copies of a printout from

NSI WHOIS database showing finjan.com domain information and a printout from http://www.ip-adress.com/ showing country of origin information regarding the IP address of Finjan.com. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy a printout from

Finjan's homepage on July 24, 2007. 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of a printout from

Finjan's website of a form for users to request Finjan White Papers. 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of a printout from

Finjan's website of a Finjan Distributor Application form. 18. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of a printout from

Finjan's website of a Finjan Reseller Application form. 19. Attached hereto as Exhibit M are true and correct copies of printouts from

Finjan's website containing an online portal for both its distributors and resellers to access via username and password.

3
MP3 20234667.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-2

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 5

20.

Attached hereto as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy a Finjan Press

Release titled "Finjan Vital SecurityTM Web Appliance Was the Only Web Security Product to Detect and Block Potentially Destructive Web Attack without Product Update or Signature" dated March 28, 2007. 21. Attached hereto as Exhibit O is a true and correct copy of a marketing

brochure downloaded from Finjan's website titled "Malicious Page under Benchmark" dated March 2007. 22. Attached hereto as Exhibit P are true and correct copies of screenshots

taken of an excel application downloaded from Finjan's website. 23. Attached hereto as Exhibit Q is a true and correct copy of the Scheduling

Order filed in the Delaware litigation dated December 5, 2006. 24. Attached hereto as Exhibit R are true and correct copies of U.S. Patent Nos.

6,092,194; 6,804,780; 7,058,822; 7,171,681; and 7,185,361. 25. Attached hereto as Exhibit S is a true and correct copy of a Press Release

pulled from PR newswire titled "Finjan Vital SecurityTM Web Appliance was the Only Web Security Product to Detect and Block Potentially Destructive Web Attack without Product Update or Signature" dated March 28, 2007. 26. Attached hereto as Exhibit T are true and correct copies of letters between

Christopher A. Seidl and James Hannah dated June 18 and June 27, 2007. 27. Attached hereto as Exhibit U is a true and correct copy of Landform Eng'g

Co. v. Am. Prop. Dev., Inc., Civ. No. 07-1195, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47183 (D. Minn. June 28, 2007).
4
MP3 20234667.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-2

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 5

28.

Attached hereto as Exhibit V is a true and correct copy of Premiere Credit

of N. Amer., LLC v. ATT Fabrication, Inc., No. 04-cv-1391, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8401 (S.D. Ind. May 5, 2005). 29. Attached hereto as Exhibit W is a true and correct copy of a document

produced in the Delaware litigation titled "Finjan Software Inc. and its Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005." (FILED UNDER SEAL). 30. Attached hereto as Exhibit X are true and correct copies of emails

exchanged between Secure and Finjan produced in the Delaware litigation. (FILED UNDER SEAL).

To the best of my knowledge and belief, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that all the statements made by me are true.

Dated: July 25, 2007

s/ Trevor J. Foster Trevor J. Foster

5
MP3 20234667.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 20 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 21 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 22 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 23 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-3

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 24 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 20 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 21 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 22 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 23 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-4

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 24 of 24

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-5

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-5

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-5

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-5

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-5

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-5

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-6

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-6

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-6

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-6

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-6

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 19

EXHIBIT P

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 19

Page 1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 19

Page 2

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 19

Page 3

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 19

Page 4

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 19

Page 5

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 19

Page 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 19

Page 7

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 19

Page 8

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 19

Page 9

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-7

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 20 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-8

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 21 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-9

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-10

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-11

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-12

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-13

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-14

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-15

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No. 0:07-cv-2198 JMR/FLN

Secure Computing Corp., Plaintiff, v. Finjan Software Ltd., and Finjan Software, Inc. Defendants.

Placeholder For Exhibits W and X to the Declaration of Trevor J. Foster and Exhibit Index in Support of Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue [FILED UNDER SEAL]

This document is a place holder for the following item(s) which are filed in conventional or physical form with the Clerk's Office: EXHIBIT W A true and correct copy of a document produced in the Delaware litigation titled "Finjan Software Inc. and its Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005. [FILED UNDER SEAL] True and correct copies of emails exchanged between Secure and Finjan produced in the Delaware litigation

EXHIBIT X

If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served upon you in conventional format. This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): ____ Voluminous Document* (Document number of order granting leave to file conventionally: _________) ____ Unable to Scan Documents (e.g., PDF file size of one page larger than 2MB, illegible when scanned)

MP3 20234774.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-15

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 2

____ Physical Object (description): ____ Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc.) on CD or other media X Item Under Seal * [Document number of protective order: 22]

____ Item Under Seal pursuant to the Judicial Conference Privacy Policy (General Order 53) (Document number of redacted version: _______) ____ Other (description):

Dated: July 25, 2007 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

By:

s/ Trevor J. Foster

Ronald J. Schutz (#130849) Jake M. Holdreith (#211011) Christopher A. Seidl (# 313439) Trevor J. Foster (#345568) 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-2015 (612) 349-8500 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION

MP3 20234774.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-16

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No. 0:07-cv-2198 JMR/FLN

Secure Computing Corp., Plaintiff, v. Finjan Software Ltd., and Finjan Software, Inc. Defendants.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 25th day of July, 2007, I caused the following documents: Placeholder for Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue [FILED UNDER SEAL]; LR 7.1(C) Word Count Compliance Certificate Regarding Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue; Declaration of Paul Hawes in Support of Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue; Affidavit of Dale Ross; Declaration of Trevor J. Foster and Exhibit Index in Support of Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue; Exhibits A - V and Placeholder for Exhibits W and X [FILED UNDER SEAL];

MP3 20234675.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-16

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 2

Certificate of Service to be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice of the electronic filing to the following counsel of record: Anthony R. Zeuli [email protected]

I further certify that a courtesy copy was delivered to Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum's chambers, and that the proposed order was filed with the court via email to the following judge: Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum [email protected]

and I certify that a copy of the proposed order and the documents noted below were filed under seal and served on counsel Anthony R. Zeuli, Esq. at Merchant & Gould, P.A., 3200 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 via Hand Delivery: Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue [FILED UNDER SEAL]; and Exhibits W and X [FILED UNDER SEAL] Finally, I certify that a complete copy of all of the above-noted documents filed electronically and conventionally were provided to James Hannah, Esq. at Perkins & Coie LLP, 101 Jefferson Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025-1114 via Federal Express.

Dated: July 25, 2007

By: _s/Trevor J. Foster___________

MP3 20234675.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-17

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FINJAN SOFTWARE LTD., and FINJAN SOFTWARE, INC., Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 07-CV-2198 JMR/FLN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CORRECTED DECLARATION OF TREVOR J. FOSTER AND EXHIBITS INDEX IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

I, TREVOR J. FOSTER, declare: 1. I am an associate with the law firm of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi

L.L.P., and am one of the attorneys representing plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation ("Secure"). 2. I submit this declaration and exhibit index in support of Secure's

Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue. 3. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. If called as a witness,

I could and would testify competently concerning these matters. 4. Secure has requested a six-month discovery extension in the pending

Delaware matter, Finjan Software Ltd. v. Secure Computing Corporation, et al. Case No.

1
MP3 20235002.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-17

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 5

06-369 (GMS) ("Delaware litigation"). Finjan opposes this extension and Secure intends on bringing this request to the Court. 5. As of this date, Finjan is producing its witnesses for depositions in the

Delaware litigation in California and Israel, not Delaware. 6. Secure Computing's counsel informed Finjan's counsel, Paul Andre, that it

had filed a complaint against Finjan in the District of Minnesota. Mr. Andre informed Secure Computing's counsel that he received authority from Finjan to accept service of the Minnesota complaint on behalf of Finjan. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Purchase Order

No. 29653 from Secure Computing. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a portion of the

box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the shipping label

on the box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the UPS tracking

information of the Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer box downloaded from the UPS website. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the return address

on an envelope contained in the box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer.

2
MP3 20235002.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-17

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 5

12.

Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy an excerpt from the

manual contained in the box received by Secure Computing labeled Finjan Vital SecurityTM Load Balancer. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of a document

downloaded from Finjan's website titled "Finjan Vital SecurityTM Web Appliance Return Warranty," Version 1.1 dated February 2007. 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit H are true and correct copies of a printout from

NSI WHOIS database showing finjan.com domain information and a printout from http://www.ip-adress.com/ showing country of origin information regarding the IP address of Finjan.com. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy a printout from

Finjan's homepage on July 24, 2007. 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of a printout from

Finjan's website of a form for users to request Finjan White Papers. 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of a printout from

Finjan's website of a Finjan Distributor Application form. 18. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of a printout from

Finjan's website of a Finjan Reseller Application form. 19. Attached hereto as Exhibit M are true and correct copies of printouts from

Finjan's website containing an online portal for both its distributors and resellers to access via username and password.

3
MP3 20235002.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-17

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 5

20.

Attached hereto as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy a Finjan Press

Release titled "Finjan Vital SecurityTM Web Appliance Was the Only Web Security Product to Detect and Block Potentially Destructive Web Attack without Product Update or Signature" dated March 28, 2007. 21. Attached hereto as Exhibit O is a true and correct copy of a marketing

brochure downloaded from Finjan's website titled "Malicious Page under Benchmark" dated March 2007. 22. Attached hereto as Exhibit P are true and correct copies of screenshots

taken of an excel application downloaded from Finjan's website. 23. Attached hereto as Exhibit Q is a true and correct copy of the Scheduling

Order filed in the Delaware litigation dated December 5, 2006. 24. Attached hereto as Exhibit R are true and correct copies of U.S. Patent Nos.

6,092,194; 6,804,780; 7,058,822; 6,357,010; and 7,185,361. 25. Attached hereto as Exhibit S is a true and correct copy of a Press Release

pulled from PR newswire titled "Finjan Vital SecurityTM Web Appliance was the Only Web Security Product to Detect and Block Potentially Destructive Web Attack without Product Update or Signature" dated March 28, 2007. 26. Attached hereto as Exhibit T are true and correct copies of letters between

Christopher A. Seidl and James Hannah dated June 18 and June 27, 2007. 27. Attached hereto as Exhibit U is a true and correct copy of Landform Eng'g

Co. v. Am. Prop. Dev., Inc., Civ. No. 07-1195, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47183 (D. Minn. June 28, 2007).
4
MP3 20235002.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-17

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 5

28.

Attached hereto as Exhibit V is a true and correct copy of Premiere Credit

of N. Amer., LLC v. ATT Fabrication, Inc., No. 04-cv-1391, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8401 (S.D. Ind. May 5, 2005). 29. Attached hereto as Exhibit W is a true and correct copy of a document

produced in the Delaware litigation titled "Finjan Software Inc. and its Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005." (FILED UNDER SEAL). 30. Attached hereto as Exhibit X are true and correct copies of emails

exchanged between Secure and Finjan produced in the Delaware litigation. (FILED UNDER SEAL). To the best of my knowledge and belief, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that all the statements made by me are true.

Dated: July 26, 2007

s/ Trevor J. Foster Trevor J. Foster

5
MP3 20235002.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 21

CORRECTED EXHIBIT R Part 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 20 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-18

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 21 of 21

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 19

CORRECTED EXHIBIT R Part 2 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-19

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 12

CORRECTED EXHIBIT R Part 3 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-20

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 14

CORRECTED EXHIBIT R Part 4 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-21

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 22

CORRECTED EXHIBIT R Part 5 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 11 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 12 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 13 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 14 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 15 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 16 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 17 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 18 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 19 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 20 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 21 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-22

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 22 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 9 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-23

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 10 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-24

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No. 0:07-cv-2198 JMR/FLN

Secure Computing Corp., Plaintiff, v. Finjan Software Ltd., and Finjan Software, Inc. Defendants.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 26th day of July, 2007, I caused the following documents: Corrected Declaration of Trevor J. Foster and Exhibits Index in Support of Plaintiff Secure Computing Corporation's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue; Corrected Exhibit R; Certificate of Service to be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice of the electronic filing to the following counsel of record: Anthony R. Zeuli [email protected].

I further certify that a courtesy copy was delivered to Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum's chambers. Finally, I certify that a complete copy of all of the above-noted documents filed electronically were provided to James Hannah, Esq. at Perkins & Coie LLP, 101 Jefferson Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025-1114 via Federal Express.

Dated: July 26, 2007

By: _s/Trevor J. Foster___________

MP3 20235030.1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Secure Computing Corp., Plaintiff, v. Finjan Software Ltd., and Finjan Software, Inc. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No: 0:07-cv-02198-JMR-FLN

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 25

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 FACTUAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 2 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................... 7 I. THE COURT CANNOT EXERCISE SPECIFIC PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER EITHER FINJAN ISRAEL OR FINJAN USA BECAUSE DEFENDANTS' LIMITED FORUM CONTACTS DO NOT RELATE TO THE CAUSES OF ACTION................................. 7 A. THE EXERCISE OF SPECIFIC PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER FINJAN ISRAEL AND FINJAN USA REQUIRES A NEXUS BETWEEN FINJAN USA'S AND FINJAN ISRAEL'S FORUM ACTIVITIES AND PLAINTIFF'S CAUSES OF ACTION............................................. 7 PATENT CAUSE OF ACTION. ...................................................... 8 TRADE PRACTICES CLAIMS..................................................... 13

B. C. II.

THE COURT CANNOT EXERCISE GENERAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANTS BECAUSE DEFENDANTS DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT MINIMUM CONTACTS WITH MINNESOTA. ........................................................................................... 16 VENUE IS IMPROPER IN MINNESOTA BECAUSE NEITHER DEFENDANT IS SUBJECT TO PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN MINNESOTA AND A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE EVENTS GIVING RISE TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS OCCURRED OUTSIDE MINNESOTA. ......................................................................... 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IS A MORE PROPER VENUE FOR THE PENDING MATTER. ................................................................................ 19 A. B. DELAWARE IS A MORE CONVENIENT FORUM FOR THE WITNESSES IN THE PENDING ACTION. ........................ 19 TRANSFER TO DELAWARE WILL PRESERVE JUDICIAL ECONOMY.................................................................. 20

III.

IV.

i

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 3 of 25

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Akro Corp. v. Luker 45 F.3d 1541 (Fed. Cir. 1995) ............................................................................................. 7 Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz 471 U.S. 462 (1985) ............................................................................................................ 7 Finley v. River N. Records, Inc. 148 F.3d 913 (8th Cir. 1998) ............................................................................................. 13 Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. Hall 466 U.S. 408 (1984) .................................................................................................... 15, 16 Johnson v. Woodcock 444 F.3d 953 (8th Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................. 16 Lakin v. Prudential Secs., Inc. 348 F.3d 704 (8th Cir. 2003) ............................................................................................. 16 Maynard v. Philadelphia Cervical Collar Co. 18 Fed. Appx. 814 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2001)................................................................ 9, 10 McGee v. International Life Ins. Co. 355 U.S. 220 (1957) ............................................................................................................ 7 Multi-Tech Sys., Inc. v. VocalTec Commc'ns., Inc. 122 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (D. Minn. 2000) ............................................................................. 10 Premiere Credit of N. Am., LLC v. AAT Fabrication, Inc. 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8401 (S.D. Ind. May 5, 2005) ............................................... 11, 12 Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. 148 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 1998) ........................................................................................... 7 Silent Drive, Inc. v. Strong Indus., Inc. 326 F.3d 1194 (Fed. Cir. 2003) ........................................................................................... 7 Statutes 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) ............................................................................................................. 1 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) ....................................................................................................... 1, 17

ii

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 4 of 25

Regulations and Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(2)................................................................. 1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(3)........................................................... 1, 17

iii

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 5 of 25

INTRODUCTION Defendants Finjan Software, Ltd. ("Finjan Israel") and Finjan Software, Inc. ("Finjan USA") moved this Court to dismiss the pending action, instituted by Secure Computing Corp. ("Plaintiff"), for lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(2). This Court's exercise of personal jurisdiction over either Finjan Israel or Finjan USA would be wholly improper and completely unfounded under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Further, the exercise of personal jurisdiction over either defendant would violate fundamental notions of fairness. In its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's brief misleads the Court as to both the facts relied on, as well as the law as it relates to such alleged facts. When all reasonable inferences are drawn from all relevant facts viewed in their true context, the inescapable conclusion is that Plaintiff has failed to make a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction. Thus, the Court should grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as to personal jurisdiction. In the event this Court determines that either Finjan Israel or Finjan USA are subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of Minnesota, Defendants urge that the Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) because venue in this judicial district is improper. In the alternative, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), this action should be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.

1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 6 of 25

FACTUAL ANALYSIS Plaintiff attempts to confuse the Court's efforts in this action by refusing to acknowledge that Finjan Israel and Finjan USA are separate entities. In its Opposition, Plaintiff inexplicably treats Finjan USA and Finjan Israel as a single entity. [Plaintiff's Opposition ("Opp.") at 3 (Docket No. 23).] Plaintiff's refusal to address Defendants as separate entities is strategic in nature and is not related to any confusion presented by the facts now before the Court. Plaintiff's combining of Finjan Israel and Finjan USA entities is an attempt by Plaintiff to aggregate the contacts of these two separate corporate entities so as to make it appear that each entity is responsible for the other's forum contacts. Throughout its brief, Plaintiff intentionally assigns forum activities attributable to only one Finjan entity to both Finjan entities to make the contacts of each entity appear more substantial. Such aggregation by Plaintiff is merely an attempt to artificially inflate the quality and the quantity of the contacts of each entity in an attempt to convince this Court that the exercise of personal jurisdiction is proper. As demonstrated in the briefing, the contacts of each entity are separate and need to be considered as such in determining the appropriateness of jurisdiction. The specific contacts of Finjan Israel and Finjan USA are set out separately in Defendants' Motion and are summarized for the Court's convenience below. Finjan USA Sales of Finjan USA products unrelated to the litigation to four entities with billing addresses in Minnesota for total revenue to Finjan USA of $98,131.90.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 7 of 25

Shipment of one unit of the accused product to Plaintiff in Minnesota in fulfillment of an order placed and paid for by a Florida entity and specifically orchestrated by Plaintiff. Operation of informative Finjan USA Website at www.finjan.com. Finjan Israel Supplied small amount of written material to Finjan USA for inclusion in product packaging shipped to Minnesota. Supplied written material for posting on the Finjan USA Website. Named owner of URL www.finjan.com. Plaintiff's description of the quality and the quantity of the contacts of Finjan Israel and Finjan USA with Minnesota are dramatically exaggerated. For example, Plaintiff asserts that it is a substantial forum contact of both Finjan Israel and Finjan USA that the accused product was shipped by Finjan USA to Plaintiff in Minnesota. As clearly stated in the declaration of Ezra Sofer, neither Finjan USA nor Finjan Israel sold the accused product to any individual or entity in Minnesota. [Decl. of Ezra Sofer ("Sofer Decl."), ¶ 7 (Docket No. 10).] In fact, the only time that Defendants are aware of the accused product entering Minnesota was orchestrated by the Plaintiff. [Affidavit of Dale Ross ("Ross Aff."), ¶¶ 1, 5-7 (Docket No. 25).] In that one instance, Plaintiff arranged for a Florida entity to purchase the accused product from Finjan USA and have it shipped directly from Finjan USA to Plaintiff.1 Finjan Israel was in no way involved in the commercial transaction orchestrated by Plaintiff.

Plaintiff's assertion on page 1 of its brief that it "purchased" the accused product "in Minnesota" is directly contradicted by the representation by Mr. Ross that he "asked
3

1

Case 1:07-cv-00690-GMS-MPT

Document 37-25

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 8 of 25

Plaintiff asserts that the warranty offered with the accused Finjan USA product shipped to Minnesota and other products promoted on the Finjan USA Website by Finjan USA constitutes a substantial forum contact for Finjan Israel solely because the warranty requires contact with Finjan Israel. In truth, a careful examination of the warranty provision clearly demonstrates that a Minnesota customer seeking relief under the warranty would not contact Finjan Israel but rather would contact the independent thirdparty distributor/reseller that sold the product to the Minnesota entity and all communications with Finjan Israel would be between the distributor/reseller and Finjan Israel. For example, in order for Plaintiff to seek relief under the warranty provision for the product purchased from Finjan USA by Modcomp, Plaintiff would contact Modcomp ­ not Finjan Israel or Finjan USA. [Decl. of Trevor J. Foster ("Foster Decl."), ¶13, Ex. G (Docket No. 26).] Such an event would not constitute a Finjan Israel substantial contact with residents of the state of Minnesota. Plaintiff asserts that Finjan USA's sales to four Minnesota residents over the course of 10 years constituted substantial contact with Minnesota. However, as is clearly evidenced by a review of the Finjan USA financial statement attached as Exhibit W of the Declaration of Trevor J. Foster, these few sales to Minnesot