Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv-00339-RNC Document 141 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
THOMAS O’CONNOR * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:00CV339 (RNC)
Plaintiff, I
V. I
LYNNE B. PIERSON, et al. *
Defendants. *
************·k·k***·k****************·k**·k·k*·k·k: 12,
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The plaintiff requests until September 18, 2006 to respond to the Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment. This time is needed because of the undersigned’s trial
schedule. The undersigned is picking a jury in Rice v. Meriden Housing Authority, et al.,
Docket No.: CV-03-04795568.
The defendants’ attorney, Michael J. Rose, does not object to this motion.
THE PLAINTIFF,
By: ~
Leon M. Rosenblatt ct00284)
Law Offices of Leon M. Rosenblatt
10 North Main Street
West Hartford, CT 06107
(860) 523-8066

Case 3:00-cv-00339-RNC Document 141 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, on this
the 12"‘ day of September, 2006 to:
Attorney Michael J. Rose
Attorney Alexandra Voccio
Howd & Ludorf
65 Wethersfield Ave.
Hartford, CT 06114
Leon M. Rosenblatt
2