Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 68.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 510 Words, 3,107 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35654/747.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 68.1 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :05-md-01717-JJF Document 747 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
Potter W H d_ D J
M AH (3161,5 OH Pa;m;r mg rane, r.
A CQYYQOH LLP Attomey at Law
[email protected]
302 984-6019 Direct Phone
1313 North Mark<=tStreet 302 658-1192 Fax
PO. Box 951
Wilniington, DE 19899-0951
302 984 6000
VVVVV\’.p()tIOFEiH(`IOI'Sl)D.C()Ill 12,
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND BY HAND
The Honorable Vincent J. Poppiti
Blank Rome LLP
Chase Manhattan Centre, Suite 800
1201 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801-4226
Re: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. Intel Corporation, et al., C.A.
No. 05-441-JJF; In re Intel Corporation, C.A. No. 05-MD-1717-JJF;
and Phil Paul, et al. v. Intel Corporation, C.A. 05-485-JJF DM 4a
Dear Judge Poppiti:
In furtherance of our discussions during the teleconference on Friday, enclosed please
find an additional notebook of materials related to the Weil documents. We intended to get this
to you yesterday, but we ran into a few logistical issues that caused the delay.
With the exception of a few additional documents to be produced this week relating to
two interviews that were recently undertaken by the Weil firm, this will confirm that Intel has
provided for in camera review all interview notes and follow-up material, that could be located
after a diligent search, reflecting factual information provided by Intel custodians to the Weil
attomeys during the Weil interview process. As discussed during the January 3, 2008 and
February 1, 2008 hearings, the materials provided for in camera review do not include materials
that would be derivative of the underlying factual information learned by the Weil attorneys
during the interviews.
Also enclosed with this letter is a copy of Intel’s December 7, 2007 filing that included
"paragraph 8 custodian summaries" for 27 custodians. We have discovered that the single Word
document submitted to your Honor on January 18, 2008 with the paragraph 8 custodian
summaries in alphabetical order was a version that had not yet incorporated these most recent set
of paragraph 8 summaries. If, in addition to the enclosed copy of the December 7, 2007 filing,
you would like to receive an updated replacement version of the Word document containing all
summaries in a single document, including these summaries from December 7, please let us
know and we will get it to you right away. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have
caused.

Case 1:05-md-01717-JJF Document 747 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 2 of 2
Page Two
The Honorable Vincent J. Poppiti
February l2, 2008
If you have any questions concerning this or any related issue, Intel's counsel are
prepared to address them.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ WZ Harding Drane, Jr.
W. Harding Drane, Jr. (#1023)
WHD/rb
Enclosures (to Judge Poppiti only)
847646/29282
cc: Charles Diamond, Counsel for AMD (without enclosures, via electronic mail)
Michael Hausfeld, Interim Class Counsel (without enclosures, via electronic mail)
Frederick L. Cottrell, lll, Esquire (without enclosures, via electronic mail)
James L. Holzman, Esquire (without enclosures, via electronic mail)