Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 62.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 460 Words, 2,805 Characters
Page Size: 612.24 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/34528/63.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 62.6 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :05-cv-00176-GIVIS Document 63 Filed O4/24/2008 Page 1 of 2
M '
OI'l`1S]3lT1€S LLP
Patricia R. Uhlenbrock
302.222;:;.6897
[email protected]
L April 24, 2008
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
844 North King Street, Room 4209
Lockbox 18
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Re: Institute for Disabilities Research and Training, Inc.
v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., C.A. No. 05-176-GMS
Dear Judge Sleet:
We serve as Delaware counsel in the above-captioned case, along with Harvey
Greenberg. After trial in the above—referenced case concluded on or about April 24, 2006, this
Court issued its Memorandum and Judgment in favor of Institute for Disabilities Research and
Training Inc. ("IDRT") on September 25, 2007. Although the Court awarded damages to IDRT,
it did not include the specific arnormt of money damages awarded to IDRT. On October 25,
2007, Plaintiff IDRT filed post-trial motions to address that issue. On the same date, Wal-Mart
(Defendant) filed a "Protective" Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit. On January 9, 2008, that Court "stayed" the appeal pending this Court’s resolution of
the post-trial motions. On January 23, 2008, the Plaintiff requested the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit to reconsider its docket order and instead, dismiss the appeal. That
7 Motion has not been decided. Also, on January 23, 2008, we wrote to this Court, reiterating the
open damage amount issue, the case status and suggested a settlement conference might help to
resolve the open matter in an expeditious and efficient manner.
We respectfully request that the Court review the status of this case and schedule a
conference, set dates for the parties’ submissions on the amount of monetary damages for the
"Phase II Contract Price" that this Court found to be due to IDRT and/or a hearing date in order
to address the open issue(s). While the Plaintiff is, of course, anxious to move this matter
forward, it understands the Court’s schedule must accommodate whatever proceeding the Court
feels is appropriate. Nevertheless, if there is anything at all that the Plaintiff or counsel can do to
help move the case along, it/we are ready to accommodate the Court.
500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 | Wilmington, DE 19801-1494 T 302.888.68OO F 302.571.1750
Mailing Address P.O. Box 2306 | Wilmington, DE 19899-2306 www.morrisjames.com

Case 1 :05-cv-OO176—GI\/IS Document 63 Filed O4/24/2008 Page 2 of 2
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
April 24, 2008
Page 2 of 2
Respectfully submitted,
Patricia R. Uhlenbrock (#401 1)
PRU/dar
Enclosures
cc: Gregory A. Inskip, Esquire (via e-filing)
Harvey R. Greenberg, Esquire (via e-mail)
Clerk of the Court (via e-filing)
1740969/1