Free Probation Petition re Revocation of Supervised Release - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :98-cr-00049-JJF Document 19 Filed 05/13/2005 Page 1 of 2
· . ` .. . . . 2 . 2 2 2
The PROB I2 , ` ·
(RCW 2,|9,1) *- 2. ··22- é cam. -· Q
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _2
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE “
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) in
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Criminal Action No. 1:98CR00049-001 JJ F
)
Walik Hasan Johnson, )
)
Defendant. )
Petition on Probation and Supervised Release
COMES NOW Frank Kurzeknabe PROBATION OFFICER OF THE COURT presenting an official repon upon
the conduct and attitude of Walik Hasan Johnsgn who was placed on supervision by the Honorable Joseph J. Farnan,
L sitting in the court at Wilmington, Delaware on the 3rd day of August 1999, who fixed the period of supervision
at three years, and imposed the general temts and conditions theretofore adopted by the court and also imposed special
conditions and terms as follows:
Pay $lO0.00 special assessment.
Defendant shall participate in a drug aftercare treatment program, which may include urine testing, at the direction and
discretion of the probation officer.
Defendant shall participate in a program of educational/vocational training at the discretion of the probation officer.
RESPECTFULLY PREsENTtNG PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS:
(If short insert here; if lengthy write on separate sheet and attach)
Above probation officer has reason to believe that Michael J. Davis has violated the tenns and conditions of his
supervised release under such circumstances that may warrant revocation of his supervised release. These conditions
are:
STANDARD CQNDITIQN #2: "You shall report to the probation officer as directed by the Court or probation
officer, and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the first five days of each month."
EVIDENQE; The defendant appeared for a scheduled office visit with the probation officer on April 7, 2005. During
that office visit, the defendant was verbally infomied that his next office visit was scheduled for Friday, April 27, 2005,
at 10:30 a.m. The defendant was also presented with written notification regarding this office visit. The defendant failed
to appear for this office visit. The defendant failed to provide any telephone, written or personal contact to explain this
absence or to reschedule his office visit.
EVIDENQE: On April 27, 2005, a letter was sent to the defendant’s reported residence (located at l240 Thatcher
Street, Apt. B, Wilmington, Delaware 1980l) scheduling him for an office visit on Tuesday, May 3, 2005, at 2:30 p.m.
The defendant failed to appear for this office visit. The defendant failed to provide any telephone, written or personal
contact to explain his absence or to reschedule his office visit.
EVIDENCE: On May 3, 2005, a letter was sent to the defendant’s residence of record (l240 Thatcher Street, Apt. B,
Wilmington, Delaware l980l) scheduling him for an Administrative Hearing on Thursday, May 12, 2005, at 9:30 a.m.
Additionally, the probation officer conducted a home visit to the defendant’s residence on May I l, 2005. There was
no response at the residence. A written tnessage was left at the residence instructing the defendant to appear for his
scheduled Administrative Hearing on May l2, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. The defendant failed to appear for this office visit and
Administrative Hearing. The defendant failed to provide any telephone, written or personal contact to explain his
absence or to reschedule this office visit and administrative hearing.

Case 1 :98-cr-00049-JJF Document 19 Filed 05/13/2005 Page 2 of 2
_ EVIDENCE: The defendant has failed to submit his required monthly reports for March and April 2005. The
' defendant has failed to provide any telephone, written or personal contact to explain why his monthly reports have not
been submitted or to explain any reason for the delay in submitting the required reports.
STANDARD CQNDITIQN #5; “You shall work regularly at a lawful occupation unless excused by the probation
officer schooling, training or other acceptable reasons."
EVIDENQE: The defendant has reported no employment during the months of February, March, April and May of
2005. The defendant has not reported any enrollment or participation in any school, training or vocational program, or
skills center. The defendant has also failed to report any employment seeking activities or developments since April
7, 2005.
§PECIAL QQNDITIQN: "The defendant shall participate in a drug aftercare treatment program, which may include
urine testing at the direction and discretion of the probation officer.”
EVIDENCE: The defendant has failed to appear for random urine testing as required by the SODAT Program on the
following dates: April I3, 2005 and April 21, 2005
EVIDENQE:The defendant has failed to appear for scheduled individual and group counseling sessions at the SODAT
Program on the following dates: April 7, 2005 (group); April I4, 2005 (group); April l8, 2005 (individual); April 21,
2005 (group); and, April 28, 2005 (group)
SPECIAL QQNDITIQ QN: "The defendant shall pay a $100.00 special assessment which is due immediately?
EVIDENQE: The defendant commenced his tenn of supervised release on April 30, 2004. The defendant has failed
to pay his $l00.00 special assessment.
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER that a warrant be issued for Walik Hasan Johnson and that he appear
before the Coun for a Revocation Hearing to determine if he is in violation of the conditions of his supervised release.
ORDER OF COURT Respe lly,
Considered and ordered this i 3 day 0f_ ·
2005. U.S. Probatio fficer
_ Place Wilmingtgn, Delaware
U. . istrict J ge
_ Date May I2, 2005