Free Motion to Seal - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

‘_”"“_`”`"""“"—""_`""*"”"“";"‘—_“"""""‘"""° Ii"““l“`_ _`C““”°`_““”`|
, . Case 3:00-cvE)%)59-DJS Document 109 Filed %/1 5/2003 Pa e 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT C UFiil' , I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICU i i
! E
2
RICHARD B. SMITH ? i
Plaintiff CIVIL ACTIO N . §
300 CV 1059 DJ l) ? `
V- I
THE GILLETTE COMPANY December 12 20*03 ? ii.-; M
Deiennent $1112 __Ti e
l
l til EY`} -»
eg in
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL U H li j
' Q C"? ii"? TE- J
I (') (jj ‘1¤;,m.>" f
Pursuant to District of Connecticut Local Rule of ivil Pr = i?J(f)(1), the i
. Plaintiff, Richard B. Smith, hereby moves for an orde se lin from Eiblic view
Plaintiffs Surreply to Defendant’s Opposition Memo reg rding Iainti s Motion to
Enforce a SettlementAgreement, with attached exhibits, at id ecemb — r12, 2003.
The Surreply and exhibits contain confidential, sensitiv non-p blic in ormation.
Counsel for both parties have previously agreed to lweqiiest th ·= all filings
related to Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce be placed under ea'. »
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
THE PLAINTIFF: 2
MR. RICHARD SM THQ
./ V Z r Ar/, 3
By: em i
Steph P. Horner, E qui e
2183 Boston Post Ro d * 1
Darien, Connecticut 0 ¢· 0 i
Federal Bar Num er: ct 2460 ,
(203) 655-7905 ; j
Y 1
I
i l i
i R

i
n n n n n lell
~. _, _ _ eeee

V ! V
" “ Case 3:00-cv(01j)59—DJS Document 109 Filed? /15/2009 Pa e 2 of 2 N
cERTu=rcA1·E or ssnvics Q
l hereby certify that a true copy of the forgoing wa . seltt vla fax a d first class
mail, postage prepaid on December 12, 2003 to: J
Albert Zakarian, Esq.
Day, Berry & Howard LLP 5 {
CityPIace I a
Hartford, CT 061 03-3499 * P
1 / J. Z ,
" ’1i~:l'; "
St • en P. Horner ,


· 2 · §
1
I"- = l 1 W