Free Witness List - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

C7 I Case 3:00-cv-00973-AHN Document 79-2 Filed O2/O3/200@ '¤f-T5 qepnr
I 1
P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
I DISTRICT OP CONNECTICUT
I Timothy Hayes : C1V]LACTIONNO.:3: 00cv0973 (AI-IN)(HBF) I
I Pl ` t`ff :
a am 1 D Ulhm Smeg Distric: Gunn -
I I Mcmmwufm ‘
versus . AT ;·Iq¤,mm_,;,,,t&, _
I COMPASS GROUP USA, INC., d/b/a °2' 3 ' _ _ _ I
I sunssr DINING ssnvics and ; *9 ’R ~¤.eIé1E1i$""°’°‘$ I
I : 29 "`"`°""""·’ I
I Defendants Daputy C19 ""`""""'” I
I PLA1NTIFF’S LIST OF INTERROGATORIES
ANSWERS THERETO, DEPOSITIONS, ETC. I
I Pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Court’s Pretrial Order, the Plaintiff hereby submits the
I following list of Interrogatories, Answers thereto, Depositions and Request to Admit which the I
I Plaintiff intends to offer at trial for purposes other than impeachment or cross-examination: ’
1) The Defendant’ s Responses to the Plaintiffs Request for Admissions dated November 13,
2000, as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20,21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, I
30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61,
62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76 and 77. I
2) The Defendant’s responses to the Plaintiffs First Request for Production dated November *
10, 2000 as follows: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32,
33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99,100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105,
106,107, 108,109, 1l0,l15,116 and 117. _
3) The Defendant’s responses to the Plaintiffs Second Request for Production dated January
19, 2001 as follows: 1,2,3 and 4.
1

..._ U


I l`. H ;LI
I ` I
4 Case 3:00-cv-00973-AHN Document 79-2 Filed O2/O3/2005 Page 2 of 3 I
4) The Defendant’s responses to the Plaintiff’s Third Request for Production dated
I September 30, 2001 as follows: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23.
· 5) The Defendant’s responses to the Plaintiff s Interrogatories dated November 21, 2000 as I I
follows: 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12 and 14. E
6) Depositions as follows: I
, 1. Exerpts Deposition - Mr. Orlandi - 3/9/01 (pgs 67-70, 104-108, 139-142)
2. Exerpts Deposition - Mr. Gaber - 4/25/01 (pgs 4-16, 61-80)
3. Exerpts Deposition - Mr. Nichols in Camiing v. Compass Group, et al 5/16/01 I
(pgs 1-4, 57-68) ‘
4. Exerpts Deposition — Mr. Orlandi in Canning v. Compass Group, et al 1/ 12/01
(pgs 1-4, 5-12, 21-24, 69-72, 109-120) I
5. Exerpts Deposition - Mr. Orlandi - 7/6/01 (pgs 8-21, 98-101, 126-127, 152-153,
163-164, 280-285) I
PLAINTIF
Trix/1oTH E I
/ a I
Stephen F. c len
Federal Bar No ct04 73
1\/[cEleney & MeGrai , LLC _
363 Main Street:_
Hartford, Connec ` ut 06106
Telephone No.: (860) 249-1400 -
Facsimile No.: (860) 549-5865
stephen@,moeleneylaw.oom _

\»" I
I .. H Case 3:00-cv-00973-AHN Document 79-2 Filed O2/O3/2005 Page 3 of 3 I
I CERTIFICATION I
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that a copy of Plaintiffs List of Interrogatories, Answers thereto, I
Depositions, etc. has been expressed mailed on this 2“" day of February, 2005 to the following
counsel of record: I
Christopher Kenney, Esq.
Margaret Paget, Esq.
Sherin and Lodgen LLP
100 Summer Street |
Boston, MA 02110 E
And mailed, first class postage prepaid, to: I
Lawrence Peikes, Esq.
Wiggin and Dana LLP
400 Atlantic Street Q
Stamford, CT 06901 -
Fred Frangie, Esq. /·‘“/
Robert Fortgang & Associates ji
573 Hopmeadow Street I _
Simsbury, CT 06070 . I
I
By I
M I
Stephen F. 1 c . ’
_ I
I