Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. .-..-..-._.._--._-. ___ ,__,,.,,,,__,_______, ___; I I
Case 3:00-cv-OO973=AHN Document 67 Fi|ed10/25/2004 Page10f4 I ‘
. "` I I
I. ,r· QV//I I
III .. I Y`? I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mmgmj 25 /\II=U5 I I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT II
--.- 1I.T¥.I])I€3TIIIC,`?IZITIKYII I
I <=vS{muw;HMiE I -
TIMOTHY HAYES : CIVIL ACTION NO: I
Plaintiff : 3:00CV0973(AHN)(HBF) I
. I
v. : I IE
: I
COMPASS GROUP USA, INC., I
d/b/a EUREST DINING SERVICES : I
and CARY ORLANDI : October 22, 2004 I
DEFENDANT I I
. I I
` I
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME I
TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION I I
1) On October 15, 2004, the undersigned first received I
I
a Copy of the Court's Ruling on the Defendants’ Motion for I
Summary Judgment. I
2) Upon receipt of said ruling, the undersigned promptly
transmitted a Copy to Co—Counsel for the plaintiff, Frederick
I
I
Frangie, Esq.
I
3) Upon review and Consultation between Co—Counsel for the
I I
plaintiff it has been determined a Motion for Reconsideration I I
I
would be appropriate under Local Rule 7(C) on the Court’s Ruling I I
on the defendants’ Motion fOr Summary Judgment. I I
4) Good Cause exists fOr the granting of this Motion for I I
I
Extension of Time, in that: I I
I
I
-1-
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
· I
i II
i ii II II

I
I
. Case 3200-cv-0097€F2I\HN Document 67 Filed 10/26/5004 Page 2 of 4 .
I

A) Although the Ruling was apparently filed in the I
clerk’s office on October 8, 2004, counsel for the I
plaintiff did not receive the ruling until October I
15, 2004, thus depriving the plaintiff of a full
week within which to respond. I‘I
I I
B) In that counsel for the plaintiff are not in I
the same office, time was necessary for co—counsel I_
for the plaintiff to consult concerning the filing ;
of such motion. I I
C) Even if a decision had been made immediately I
upon receipt of the ruling, one weeks time was I
insufficient within which to prepare the Motion I
. for Reconsideration given the work necessary, the I
professional commitments of both attorneys for the I
plaintiff and absence from the office on October I
21, 2004 by the undesigned as a result of illness. I
I
5) On October 22, 2004, the undersigned attempted to I I
II
contact Attorney Margaret Paget and Attorney Chris Kenney at the I
office of counsel for the defendant in an attempt to determine I
the position of the defendants on this Motion. Neither Attorney I
Paget nor Attorney Kenney were in the office on October 22, 2004. I
I I
6) The undersigned did contact Lawrence Peikes, Esq. of
I
I
Stamford, Connecticut, local counsel for the defendants in the I
above—captioned matter, in regard to the request for extension. I
I
Attorney Peikes indicated he felt he did not have the authority I
to either grant consent or object to the request for extension I
II
without consultation with either Attorney Kenney or Attorney I
I
Paget. I
I
I
-2 — I
I
I
I I
I I
II
Il I
I] , I
I
*"*"'***‘" "*’"” "' 1 ‘**'*1'i"‘;"""*'*”"”""*'“*1 ·

I
_ Case 3:00-cv-OO97?>IIHN Document 67 Fi|ed10/i5/5004 Page30f4
I I
I I
II
WHEREFORE, the plaintiff respectfully moves for an extension I
I I
of time within which to file a Motion for Reconsideration of the I I
Court's Ruling on the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment to I I
November 2, 2004. I
I
Respectfully submitted, I
I
PLAINTIFF I I
TIMOTHY HAYES I
I- I
ji I
// I I
I I
1/ I
I I
By. . I I I
Stephe__ . Eleney I
Federal B r No: ct040730 I
McEleney & McGrail I I
363 Main Street I
Hartford, CT 06106 I
Telephone No: (860) 249-1400 I
Facsimile No: (860) 549-5865 I I
E—mail: [email protected] I
I I
I Z
|
II ‘
I I

II I
II I
I I
I
II I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
. -3- II I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I

Case 3:00-cv-O09Z3=II\HN Document 67 Filed 10/ -/ 004 Page40f4 I
\ i L\<--I'], `-mi I

I I
I
I
I
CERTIFICATION I
= I
I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent via I I
facsimile to the following counsel of record this 22m day of I I
October, 2004: I
I I
Christopher A. Kenney I
Sherin and Lcdgen LLP I I
100 Summer Street I
Boston, MA 02110 I
I I
Margaret H. Paget, Esq. I
Sherin and Lodgen LLP I
100 Summer Street `
Boston, MA 02110
Lawrence Peikes, Esq. I
Wiggin and Dana LLP I
400 Atlantic Street I
Stamford, CT 06901 I
I I
Frederick Frangie, Esq. I I
Robert Fortgang & Associates I
573 Hopmeadow Street I
Simsbury, CT 06070
I
Honorable Holly B. Fitzsimmons I
United States District Court ///"` I
915 Lafayette Boulevard I _
Bridgeport, CT 05594 //////// I
(/ / /,. I
_/ /
/ · !
StepheI F- I
t, I
I
-
I
I

'
I
- 4 -
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
____1______________ ________________________________________ ___ I I