Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 48.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 1, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 296 Words, 2,214 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9693/61.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 48.3 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
MHmw—_**_ _“M____________________.__----—-.»ew—----——————*—··—·· ····~· "“““—’“‘Y“"—
N G` Case 3:00-cv-OOGEGZRCFD Document 61 Filed O3/$162004 Page 1 of 1 I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
ZORAIDA SANTIAGO : CIVIL ACTION NO.
Plmntyjf : 3:00CV00662(CFD)
r _ · iii ,
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL ‘ _ _ [ji? :__ |
SERVICES, ET AL. : _. u __
Defendants : March 26, 2004 f_ U
i I ‘,,.I is $.1
DEFENDANTS’ MIDTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
g TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OFM R
ig j COMES NOW the Defendants, Department of Social Services, Patricia Wilson-Coker
Z5 A I'!
gg and Dennis King, and hereby respecttiilly request, pursuant to Local Rule 7, an enlargement of
s¤ E`
»§§ time of thirty (30) days to file their summary judgment motion, up to and including April 30,
" I "`· .
[fj E3 2004. In support of their motion, the defendants represent as follows:
ai, (if!
lift lil "iil. ri`
l. The cun·ent Scheduling Order has set the deadline for filing dispositive motions
{gd ta . IE
,1;,; ti on March 27, 2004. Inasmuch as said date is a Saturday, defendant’s motion for summary
judgment according to the rules of the court is due on Monday, March 29, 2004.
I 2. The parties are currently interested in settlement discussions. The parties are
scheduled for a settlement conference before a para-judicial officer, Attorney Emanuel Psarakis,
. \·""
.0 ei .
O on7§pg‘I,l 5, 2004.
{lh (,,3 é
Q O. *{f$jf3,7.} The undersigned has been diligently working on the preparation of said summary
tt __ 2 '
% fgidginentii motion and all accompanying paperwork. However, since the complaint alleges five
...»· *.‘ 5
QM c€%nts:<;f'Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, negligent infliction of emotional distress, intentional
infliction of emotional distress and negligent supervision, approximately a half a dozen affidavits
must be prepared along with numerous documents. Furthermore, extensive legal arguments must
I
l