Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 70.9 kB
Pages: 1
Date: October 30, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 440 Words, 2,678 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9481/58.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut ( 70.9 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut
i
i · `. _ - ase 3:00-cv-OO834—SB_U Document 58 Filed 10/28/2003
n s O O
i . \ H W ,$ee%
· 5 ` 1i"" i L. QI.
l W
E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [BU] UCI 2 Ll I0: I
i DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
.-• L . .. -· IIS. · .
I ."’ Lili i.·tl:>¤ ’£ =__;-
E STEWARD MACHINE COMPANY I 3:00 CV 00834 up I TIT W i · E
E PLAINTIFF I
D-. .
`
IC!
--i
0 VS. ;
M
E WHITE OAK CORPORATION et al I
is DEFENDANT : October 23, 2003
is
5 JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES
ui 15 AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL CALENDAR CALL
: ,§ if`.] EJ The Plaintiff Steward Machine Company ("Steward") and the Defendants National Unio
O H ’ A T' ~-L
O O Q . `
°1 cg) _ 4_ __ Qre Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National Union") and White Oak Corporation
O
E Eg , {?‘$White Oak") hereby submit this Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order Deadlines and to
gu {..,2 i ` Z
,5 g Eiintiniie the Trial Calendar Call which has been scheduled for November 5, 2003.
Q] ••
D ca
.1 I This is a construction dispute. For the past tive months the parties have been diligently
.•.• nt
E': g pursuing the completion of discovery. The parties have also discussed the referral of this matter
cu c> 2
> or 5
E - to private mediation. The parties had originally discussed conducting a private mediation of this
ur E i
at a
E ai? matter in September or October. However, the scheduling of a mediation has been delayed due F
in :1 `
A 5 to the time re uired to complete experts reports and depositions. The scheduling of mediation
it ‘“
n
E ` has also been delayed by virtue of the unavailability of counsel and their consultants/experts on
un *0 ‘
ua ua R , . 3
:: ·-• ~
H 5 \ various dates rn September and October. I
a tl °’ i
§ '§ I E The parties now have a firm date for their mediation ·-· Friday, December 5. The parties
?
Ti 3 § have also agreed upon Magistrate Judge F. Owen Eagan as their mediator.
¤•-• »-i ·—• M I
- ·-·• .-·i 43
E 3 § The parties seek additional time within which to participate in the mediation on
$4 r l
1 ii . . . . I
g '§ r § fg December 5. The parties wish to exhaust settlement options before completing their preparations i
ai
.-i - u s
- ns M tn an i
rn u . <:> t
.. I ° H 23; i
tl.! sl-. WOLF, HOROWITZ, ETLINGER, & CASE L. L. C. Counselors At Law `
tu E t I; {S 3 99 Pratt Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 *(860) 724-6667 " Fax (860) 293-1979 * Juris No. 402488 \
-- "mm*·"·— _,_,_ I
. . " I