Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I I I · _,_ . , I
I _//` ase 3:00-cv-00720-CFD Document 87 ‘ Filed O3f’l7/2I O4J;¤Pd§é>'1arotj1»rP,>tzt
I II; I I
I Z, I I I I III I
I UNITED sums msrmcr coum: I-Qlia :445: I I) ID nr: 5;, I
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I I YI,,III.I I?,`I`,,€IIIII<`é` I
I I I II I ,.,·—JII·I.;:ItJ Cl I
I I = I I
I THDMAS SANDERS : CIVIL ACTION NO:I I E I I
I Plaintiff : 3:00C\/00740 (CFD) I/I III- I
I : 1 I
I V- = , I I
I PHILIP I: F LEUR, GERALD HINES, ·
I MII`?/[HAE GLOVER AND JOHN : I
A I ST ' I NG : MARCH 16, 2003 .
Defendants : I
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FOR I
PRETRIAL DEADLINES I I
I`? I) Onl arch 10, 2004 this court entered a pretrial order establishing th I I
I Agn The parties to tile memorandum on number of perem I ory
`E _ Z: eq _ challenges, Motions in Limine regarding evidence an otions to I
· I ‘ · IIE Bifurcate trial, with accompanying Memorandum by arch 18, 2004 at
I¤<__ I. 5:00 p.1n. I
\ Opposition papers to the foregoing were to be tiled ‘o)I arch 23, 2004 at I
EQ - ° I ,,; €;:EZi:5:00 p.rn. I
· I I; ~ ¤¤ sz I
3 . _ C);`;" I Arguments on pending motions were to be held on M:IIch 25, 2004 at 2:00
`\4\ p.m. I
V I I
S ) Su •··. equent to said pretrial order the parties engaged in settlement disI ussions which,
I I
w altheugh n t fruitful, have resulted in the court directing a status conference I`I1r the purpose of
discussing ettlement for March 23, 2004 at 11:00 a.m.
I ;
I
I I I
II I
I F
I
. { I , . I . I I . - 7 rr - ,