Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

R A Case 3:OO—cv-00705-CFD Document 90 Filed 02/ 1 2/2004 Pq-9y’j[‘o}‘,liO`° {MK?
{ . b` - , (._ xi ` Q) I
’ ~—»-- U x
i Q UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _? [fj Y ,`
Y
J \< f?`i¤‘: 4 .;;; 1 : srl <>. 1 ,
) ' * ...J’ L; LE :
I In re: PE Corporation Securities Litigation ) Master 1 e No.=‘_3_;00C§/j_05,(.CFD), M T l
> \ ;t· in at “?* ' 1
[ ) FEBRUARY 11, 2004 L L (
MOTION ON CONSENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY
1 TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO CLASS CERTIFICATION
i . Lead plaintiffs David Berlin and Vinh Vuong ("Lead Plaintif`fs"), through their
i w undersigned counsel, hereby move on consent pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) for a 3-day q
i \ extension of time, through and including, February 17, 2004, to file their Reply in further support
E of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. In support of this motion, Lead Plaintiffs represent:
Q 1. Lead Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class Certification ("Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion") i
· \on July 18, 2003. \
S { _ 1
Q Q 2. Defendants completed class discovery on November ll, 2003, and, subsequently, i
gl iled their Opposition to Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification on December 29, 2003. E
\»
\ _ 3. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Motion For Extension of Discovery Schedule, filed I
_ S September 30, 2003, and granted by this Court on October 9, 2003, Lead P1aintiffs’ Reply in i
§
\\ t . .
;—__-.. further support of Plaintif`fs’ Motion for Class Certification is due tomorrow, Thursday, February
t
w 12, Additional time is required in order to adequately address the arguments raised in
i' \1 .Defendants’§Opposition brief.
·· i c z R .i··. · z LZ
M Q T il. - 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 7(b), counsel for Lead Plaintiffs has inquired of counsel
irifor defendants,-vvho have consented to the relief requested.
5. I This is the first request for extension of time to file Lead Plaintiffs’ reply brief
following the filing of Defendants’ Opposition to Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. i




`F"""""`*