Free Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

( I Case 3:00-cv-0043vZH Document 151 Filed 06/WOO4 Paged! dif`) in ‘
LU 3 f l 1
i I i
`S zulu JAN
\ I b D I: OU
_ V "‘l"‘•_-~!-..
\l JNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Bggglyvyyi, U 9 —¤U t; t
§ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT °"' '"Y Cf _, , `
\ DANT E DeLORETO, : CIV. NO. 3:00CV435 (J CH) D I ;
Q Plaintiff] : l
VJ RIOMAS MITNEY, ET AL., JANUARY 15, 2004 l
\· Q Defendants. I
& MOTION FOIL SANCTIONS AND/OR A PROTECTIVE ORDER A {
I !
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ll(c) (1) (A) and 26(c), defendant Thomas ( t
N E/Iitney hereby moves for the ii nposition of monetary sanctions against plaintiff Dante DeLoreto, 0 R
N I
individually, for the pro-se filii lg of a purported Rule 60 motion that was scheduled for argument on
December ll, 2003. In additic n, as a result of the plaintiffs recent harassment and abuse of process, I
e undersigned seeks a protec ive order enjoining the plaintiff from filing any additional documents, 0 i l
KQ pleadings, motions and/or lawsuits with the Court. p
N .
g Defendant Mitney resp :ctfully requests this Court award, as a minimum, a sanction in the R
suitftftf fivehundred dollars ($. 500.00), payable to the Town of Wethersfield, Connecticut (the .
E :s— Ep.;) é I E
< ‘ l
fee;]. to bEji1'1CL1I`l`Cd by the Tow 1 in responding to the plaintiffs frivolous motion, and for attending l · \
ct . !
gi -;;> —, k-.,- ~ _ _ _ i ‘
§ I tltgcbecémber 1 1, 2003 hearing g, which the plaintiff failed t0 attend. .
2 :..1
\\ A memorandum and ei hibits are submitted herewith in accordance with Local Rule 9(a) (I).
ge
mon