Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 66.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 18, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 357 Words, 2,339 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 799.7 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9116/143.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 66.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-00339-RNC Document 143 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
THOMAS O’CONNOR * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:00CV339 (RNC)
Plaintiff, :
V. I
LYNNE B. PIERSON, et al. *
Defendants. *
******·k·k***·k·k***·k·k·k·k·k·k*·k·k·k·k******·k*******·k·: S 1 8,
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The plaintiff requests until September 26, 2006 to respond to the Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment. Currently the deadline is September 18, 2006.
This time is needed because of the trial schedule of the pIaintiff’s attorney, Leon
M. Rosenblatt. Attorney Rosenblatt was in state court picking a jury from September
, 12, 2006 through September 15, 2006 in Rice v. Meriden Housing Authority, etal.,
Docket No.: CV-03-04795568. Evidence in the Rice trial began today and will continue
for at least one week. The pIaintiff’s attorney anticipated being able to complete the
response to the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment sooner because he did not
believe the Rice trial was going to start until the end of this week. Due to this trial, the
plaintiff requests one additional week to finish the response to the defendants' Motion
for Summary Judgment.
This is the pIaintiff’s second motion for extension of time.
The defendants' attorney, Michael J. Rose, was contacted regarding his position
on this motion, but as of the signing of this motion, Attorney Rose has not indicated his
position.

Case 3100-ev-00339-RNC Deeuntent 143 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 2 or 2 »
0.0 ~
Q THE PLAINTIFF,
By: ” , ,
Lynn Mahoney (ct20996)
1, Law Offices of Leon M. Rcsenbla . I
A 10 Nenn Mein Street
ttt. gg 1 wut Hartford, cr 06107 g
N (seo) 523-8066 ` gt
QQ; This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, on this
if ’ the 18"‘ day of September, 2006 to: it
i g Attomey Michael J. Rose
fg Attomey Alexandra Voccio t __,,
=,i Hcwd & Ludorf , t`
i 65 Wethersfield Ave. " g
z E Hamm, CT 06114 A
Q A Lynn - ¤ enev —‘’t ,
' l ·V’`
/ 1 nil
it A no o t