Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 174.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 428 Words, 2,661 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 791 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9104/111.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut ( 174.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 111 Filed 02/03/2004 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
HENRY A KORSZUN; WOJTEK W. Civil Action No.
BOROWSKI and COMPUCLOZ : 300CV327 (JCH)
CORPORATION :
Plaintiffs, :
vs.
February 3, 2004
PUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES MULTIMEDIA, INC.,:
J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.; :
MATTEL, INC. and/or :
BRODERBUND SOFTWARE, INC.; :
and LAND’S END, INC., :
Defendants. :
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
PLAlNTIFFS’ SUR-REPLY REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES
The Court entered a Memorandum Endorsement (Docket No. 110) on November
24, 2003 granting Plaintiffs leave to tile a brief of up to 15 pages by December 10, 2003 to
respond to the Defendants Reply brief regarding their motion for an award of attorneys
fees. The undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs received an email from the EOF system on
December 3, 2003 but did not access a copy of the order until after the due date for
response had passed. No paper copy of the order was received by mail and thus the
oflices of Plaintiffs counsel never docketed the due date for response at the time of the
order. Plaintiffs request leave to file a Sur—Reply at this time, even though the
accompanying Sur—Reply is not being not filed within the time specified in the Court’s

Case 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 1 1 1 Filed 02/03/2004 Page 2 of 3
original ruling. The proposed Sur—Reply is less than the fifteen (15) page limit established
in the original order.
The Court has already given approval for filing of a Sur—Reply and has not yet ruled
on the pending motion for attorneys fees. Thus it is respectfully requested that the Court
grant Plaintiffs leave to file the accompanying Sur—Reply.
Respectfully submitted,
P. McNamara - ct01220
• ·» E STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS
986 Bedford Street
Stamford, CT 06905
Tel. (203) 324-6155
Attorney for Plaintiffs
- 2 -

Case 3:00-cv-00327-JCH Document 1 1 1 Filed O2/O3/2004 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true copy of the foregoing
PLAlNTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
PLAlNTlFFS’ SUR-REPLY REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES
is being served on this date, by first class mail, postage prepaid, on the following counsel
for defendants:
William l·l. Bright
l\/lcCarter & English, LLP
cityiaiace i, 36th nw
185 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT 06103
And to
Matthew D’Amore
Morrison & Foerster LLP
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10104-0012
A
Date: February 3, 2004 ;
’tephen P. McNamara
- 3 -