Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

._-...nn.i...... ...._..;n.n...........i I
Case 3:00-cv(O%316-WWE Document 89 Fi|egO4/13/2004 Page1 0f1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT%gEm$`@ I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT y
ZUU APR P =
THE CADLE COMPANY, : 3:00cv316gwWE) &Eead)l Us I ,
P1sl¤*==Lff· = u.s. msmncr c0um"
: BRHJGEPORT. CONN
V. B E
DOROTHY MURREN/GRACE JONES, : i
Defendants. : 2
ORDER N
The Court requests the plaintiff to elaborate upon its
statement at page 8 of its Reply Brief that the facts giving rise
\
to the claims for imposition of constructive trusts "do not
satisfy the essential elements for claims under the Act."
Plaintiff should apply its analysis to each property upon which i
it seeks to impose a constructive trust.
The brief should be submitted by May 17, 2004. Defendants R
may file a response to that brief within 20 days of its
submission. |
. _ rx .. `lvl I
WARREN W. EGINTO1?—YA
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ;
Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this\7;TLday of April, i
2004.
i
W