Free Order on Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_
- Case 3:00-cv-0031 1-CFD Document 132 Filed O3/22/2004 Page 1 of 2 {
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F g L E D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT '
1oHN E. cox, EXECUTIVE ; Zutlu MAH 2 2 A I!= 2 `I
DIRECTOR, NEW HAVEN : (4__ _
COMMISSION ON EQUAL ; U »-I T; lj; j {C F C JR '}'
OPPORTUNITIES, ; ·· E »‘~·l‘* it il-YU» L 5.
Plaintiff; :
v.
: Civil Action No. 3:OOCV3ll (CFD)
EDWARD L. BLAND, et al. :
Defendants, :
v.
BEACON/CORCORAN, JENNISON,
LP, et al. :
Third Party Defendants. :
I QLLIN G
Pending are the following motions: Beacon/Corcoran’s Motion for Summary Judgment re
the Cross Claims of third party defendant Stamford Wrecking Company [Doc. # 72],
Beacon/Corcoran’s Motion for Summary Judgment re the complaint of New Haven Commission
on Equal Opportunities [Doc. # 77], Cuom0’s Motion tc Dismiss or in the alternative for
Summary Judgment [Doc. # 78], NI-IHA and Robert Solornon’s Motion to Dismiss or in the
Alternative for Summary Judgment as to third party defendant Stamford’s Counterclaim [Doc. it
82], and NI-IHA and Robert Solomon’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary
Judgment [Doc. it 83].
The motions are DENIED, without prejudice, in light ofthe pending stipulation of
withdrawal by the plaintiff This ruling is without prejudice to the parties renewing any of these
motions by filing a notice, and if such notice is filed the subject motion will be deemed filed as of


3% ;;:; is-gg; _i;_§§&i_}}jHjEH;,x, ¥_,L:L;EZ'i""I "


Case 3:00-cv-00311-CFD Document 132 Filed O3/22/2004 Page 2 of 2 I
its original filing date. .*9-.
__ SO ORDERED this day of March 2004, at Hartford, Connecticut.
CHRISTOPHER F. EEONEYTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Q
___ ______________________,_,_......__.,,,__,___________--..-... l