Free Order on Motion for Pretrial Detention - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

· a e 1 of 1

District of * · {digs Q

_ TED STATES_OF AMERICA
. { ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
[C / 1 ` f A Case Number:
Defendant .
In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3l42(t), a detention hearing has been held. I conclude that the following facts require the
detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.
'/ Part I—Findings of Fact
[Q6 The defendant is charged with an offense described in IS U.S.C. § 3l42(t)(l) and has been convicted of a Q federal offense Q state
or loca] offense that would have been a federal offense if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed — that is
Q a crime of violence as defined in I8 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).
Q /an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.
[3 an offense for ighich a 2{aximum term of impris nment of ten years or more is prescribed in
SC 6 5} = 9 . . .*
Q a felony that was committed after the defendant had nvicted of two or more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C.
§ 3l42(t)(1)(A)-(C), or comparable state or local offens . .
Q (2) The offense described in finding (I) was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.
Q (3) A period of not more than tive years has elapsed since the Q date of conviction Q release of the defendant from imprisonment
for the offense described in finding (I).
{Q/ (4) Findings Nos. (l), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the
safety of (an) other pcrson(s) and the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.
` Alternative Findings (A)
Qi (1) There isrprobable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense , _
which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in Oy ily Q . ,
/·’ l Q under IS U.S.C. § 924(c). y P x
[Z (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding I that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure _ rp _ _
the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community. (
Alternative Findings (B) = ~- __ __;
[3/(U There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear. Q_ /
[li]/(2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another P€i‘$0¤ OT lhs ¤0¤¤¤¤¤iiY- ·=·· ·g · // / _ [ __:_r,; of
Part II———Written Statement of Reasons for Detengion
I iind that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by milear and convincing evidence I] a prepon-
derance ofthe evidence that
. / : ` _ _: /
Part IH—Directions Regarding Detention `
The defendant is committed to the custody ofthe Attomey General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate,
to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or eing held in custody pendi appeal. The defendant shzdl be afforded 8
reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsi order of a ourt of thiytlnffegd S tes or on request of an attomey for the
Government, the person in charge ofthe corrections facility shall de e thoidefendantcftq the Uni ed Statdsiifarshalfor thc purpose of an appearance
in connection wit a c rt proceeding.
at M ._ -..-er
D te S" J n' .
8 igftge gifgnge"
Name and Title of Judge
*Insert as applicable: (a) Controlled Substances Act (2} U.S.C. § SDI er seg.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (2i U.S.C. § 95] n _
er seq.); or (c) Section I ofAct of Sept. I5, l98U (2] U.S.C. § 95511).