Free Order on Motion to Produce - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

`. ,. |,)r,.7L . L ,,.r -........
W ` Case 3:00-cr-00075-AWT Document 291 Filed O2/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
. S
A .
m, =
Q
p IN TH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT y` _
CH FOR TH DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT A {ji;)
w .
P . 1 1
E KENNETH HAWKlNS» 5 U A 2 V
_ Petitioner,
E2
.9.
u
Ii —v—
g Criminal No. 3:00 CR 75(AWT)
0 Civil No. 3:05 CV l186(AWT)
g UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
3 Respondents, MOTION T0 PRODUCE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE E
5 OR IN TH ALTERNATIVE ISSUE A DEFAULT
E JUDGM NT AGAINST THE GOVERNM NT FOR LACK
2 OF JURISDICTION
B 1
§
m
__f ...................
*5
u
g NOW INTO COURT, Comes Kenneth Hawkins, the Petitioner appearing through _
r
3 Pro—Se representation and respectfully request and moves this Honorable Court i
é to issue an order to the United States Government to produce the letter of
C!
3 acceptance or in the alternative issue an order against the United States for i
U lack of jurisdiction I
0
“ E
w
E A Pro—Se litigants pleadings are to be construed liberally and held to i
Q a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. HAINES V.
§ KERNER, 30 L. Ed. 2d. 652(l972): ESTELLE V. GAM LE, 50 L. Ed. 2d. 251(l972). A
§ court should make a reasonable attempt to read the pleadings to state a valid
s
§ claim on which the Petitioner could prevail, despite the Petitioners failure to
E E cite proper legal authority, his confusion of various legal theories, his poor
n
B'§ syntax and sentence construction, or his unfamiliarity with the pleading re—
0
Q 0 quirement. HALL V. BELLMDN, 935 F. 2d. 1106: Also See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(f)(holding
Un ua ·Y-····————
g_2 i that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice).
2 u T" -
rn H Ag CD Z`
m . H · _
,.¤ _ .¤rr‘·._I —. ;.`* .
_•_| E . I {J" _ I -
E E ggf l¤-Tn;Support Thereof, The Petitioner States As Follows:
g El Ic..__ ip I
gf 2*:1; if F 4 1
H B EN {Fi l
¤· ::1 E S ‘T
E 3* ' . EX} `
H Ln 1 u
Z m ` E ?
E ¤ _ E m i