Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 76.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 5, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 597 Words, 3,555 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23086/16.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 76.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
1 . .. .. ,..,7,),, I , _ ___ _________i__n`v_rrv_W_-_j?—____¤—*F'FH lL“1»‘1 1mm-._*_"—'_-.—-—__.iT-..“"n`ifr)r`mi__
- .· Case 3:03-cv-00715-PCD Document 16 Filed 04/01/2001 Pag 1 1 of 2
1
I 1
| 1
1
LIOOLE St ROBINSON, I..I..P. 1 1
BBE THIRD AVENUE 1
NEW YORK, Nx IDDI7 1 1 ’
(HIE] EEI7-EEOC]
FACSIMILEI (EIB} EB7-IEDE `
www.IicIdIsr¤binson com I
SAMUEL FINKELSTEIN (IEEE-IEEE) 1 OBERT 5_ CLEMEN-I-E
Mmmm M.nn:1e1r~1s¤N mnumeei *‘*FF"—"“E ‘*"""‘:E5° DF EDUNSEL
THE LAW OFFICE OF JAMES R. HLIBBARO .| 1
JAMES A- r—¤»¤r5¤~ TDWERS E"·"'-'”'"G 1 me i. GREENBERGER 1
Bl-AINE H- EDRTNIEK IIBOO I.I.5. HIGHWAY ONE. SUITE 4OO 1 AVID MAREK
E-I-HAN A- EHEEHER NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 334OB AME5 cl MALL-IDS
Mici-mai. E. ism; ·r ‘5E" E'E‘E"‘:":’ .
JAMES E1 HUEEANREDFI E—MA|L: [email protected]|Idd|erobinson.com t QQj’°]f$_11§1“é11,’j"”'“T“"’*'
JEFFREY L. LIDOLE _ EFFREY ZIMMERMAN
CHRIETINE A. PALMIERI 1 513 ,1 5w15;;1(;Hgw5K| 1
MARC A. SLIESWEIN CIHN A. KARCIL
LYSIZIN C. BRLINE
"ADNIlTTEfJ ONLY IN FLUFHOA, 1 Z
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __ 1
AND NORTH CAROLINA 1 1 1
1 1 1
April 1, 2004 1
1
1 1
‘ I
1 1
VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL 1
Honorable Peter C. Dorsey 1
Senior United States District Judge 1
- . . 1
United States D1str1ct Court
141 Church Street 1 1 1
New Haven, Connecticut 06510 1
1 .
Re: Randolph Johnson v. Aon Corporation and Aon Con Iting, In .
Case No.: 3-03-CV-715 PCD
n 1 1
. 1 1
Dear Judge Dorsey. 1 1 1
1
I write with Defendants’ counsels’ consent to respectfully r =1;uest an xtension of
the discovery cut-off until May 15, 2004. _
Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated February 27, 2001, both arties have 1
endeavored to complete discovery by April 15, 2004. To this end, both arties ha e cured all
production defects, taken three depositions, and scheduled two other deposi `ons in e' rly April.
The primary reason for this extension is that on March 25, l 04, Plai tiff learned
that two additional employees of Defendants must also be deposed. estimon by Joseph `
Chrostowski, Plaintiffs direct supervisor and the head of Aon’s No heast R gion Sales, T
revealed that Roger Vaughn, President, Aon Consulting, and Ann Ku el, hea of Human
Resources for Aon Consulting, contributed to Aon’s decision to E1errn1nat Plaint1ff’ s
I 1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1

»--—r———-·— . -- -- -. . . _

_ ,_,, `mv,-.._ lLLJ.mll-.·.;.g.ri-—.·;-—H~---—---~»--
I · - · Case 3:03-cv-00715-PCD Document 16 Filed O4/O1/2004I Pagel2of2
. I
\ LIDDLE Si ROBINSON, L.L.P. E :
I The Honorable Peter C. Dorsey 2 April 1, 004 E
I I
employment. While parties might need to resolve some issues concern g the s ope of Ms.
Kuesel’s deposition, Defendants do not object in principal to either depositi n.
We request a four-week extension at this time becausl (1) se ral of the I
individuals Plaintiff must depose have preexisting commitments; (2; the tw additional I
depositions —— of Mr. Vaughn and Ms. Kuesel — will take place in Chid go, Illin is; and (3) I
counsel for both parties have trials scheduled for April and/or May 2004; Both pa ties believe _
they can complete discovery by May 15, 2004. I I I
We appreciate your assistance. R I
Very truly your E, (
David Marek (Q 25109) R
cc: Christina L. Feege, Esq. (via facsimile / (212) 832-2719) I I
I I
I I `
I I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I
i I
I I I
I
II I
Ii I
I I
I II I
I I
I I
ll I
| I
l'
I (
. I
I
I I I
N" I I
I I I
I