Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

n H-- N I ``'``` "`__`”""-“-"m"°I`>F_;_°`M_""`""°" ;,""" _”"`\.- -·-··-·-·——- I
I I Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD DocuEerD33 Filed 04/26/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
Q\ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
I .._,______,..._._____...__,____.....____________________ _ _____ X
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM : @5 I
NEWTON, ROB ERT FITZPATRICK, and MERIT : CASE NUMBER: · ’
CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC., 1 3:03 CV 00644 (CFD)
Plaintiffs, I
vs. f
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and :
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., : ‘March 30, 2004 I
2 I
Defendants. : _ __
..................... .. .................................. .. ..... X i'
°\ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO REPLY T0 PLAINTIFFS’ p
E CV r QPPOSITION TO DEFEND¤ANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Eiiiikizendants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National
' $ <‘ 2 I
E j` ILI`ni1on")Qand Technical Services, Inc. ("AIGTS") (hereinafter referred to collectively as I
F, -0 ...-.'l,.‘;
\ ¤·::1-.·t,I " {pl': Ihi__'_
E I_`;·f‘Nation§lfUnijon§j) hereby respectfully move pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(l) and D. Conn. L. I
,QEiiLm :.;.3e I
E Civ. R. ;’Q?§b)(3;)jfor an extension of time to reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion I
¤ _ U To I
E ki Dismiss, currently due on March 31, 2004. Defendants move that the Court_exten'd_, the time
Ii [L iii _ I
§ for such reply until April 23, 2004, at which time, on the current schedule, a similar repay will'IiE%i I
I l 1 fi? :;;;/;;:1
`¥ -due in the companion case of Gwynn, et al., v. National Union, et al., Docket ?Nun;rber‘f§:03
@ < $1154 (CFD) (“G‘Wy1¢M”). IIII J I-I I3;
C"? {Ti iii
In support of this motion, undersigned counsel states as follows: I` I I
· l. This is the second request for an extension of time made by National I
I Union with respect to this time limitation. {
{00064938; 2, 0040-3}
I