Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 48.0 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 27, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 323 Words, 2,050 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23015/32.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 48.0 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
t __ Case 3:03-cv-00644-CFD Document 32 Filed O4/26/2OO4gg@UqgqL2(gj)1~fYP{15
, MA O O
i I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
{ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
BRUCE CHARLES RYAN, RUSSELL WILLIAM )
NEWTON, ROBERT FITZPATRICK, and MERIT ) CASE NUMBER: ,/
CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC., ) 3:03 CV 00644 (CFD)
)
Plaintiffs, )
> l
vs- ) 1 , _ if;
> ; .;
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) T, as L; ··’*
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., and ) Q jg}, W g
AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., ) April 23, 2004 .,.. .
-- Defendants. ) Q; ; no
U3 i . ···‘
A FQREXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’
{ fl- QPBOSITION TO DEFEN]]¤ANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
w` Q an-iii 5* Dlefenilants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National
auxin.: (TCI ff`) '. ,,
)` _ {Q2?} , l.._s 4* _
\ _ Uri*iiii’i’l") and; AIQj;T_echnical Services, Inc. ("‘AIGTS") (hereinafter referred to collectively as i
I .‘`. l
§ kg “National Unionll) hereby respectfully move pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(l) and D. Conn. L.
ki p 5 giv. R. 7(b)(3) for an extension of time to reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defenda;nts’ Motion
C"` to Dismiss, currently due on April 23, 2004. Defendants move that the Court extend the time for
l
R such reply until April 26, 2004, at which time, on the current schedule, a similar reply will be |
X I
g \ A due in the companion case of Gwynn, et ai., v. National Union, et el., Docket Number 3:03 CV
i
Q Q FIS4 (CFD) (“Gwynn”).
In support of this motion, undersigned counsel states as follows; l `
1. This is the third request for an extension of time made Unionf
li" r_ .1 if in
with respect to this time limitation. il. U gg
( Z j` r.·».·,s.
~ ....-lr _`$ _¤·- lt} amy
_ 2. National Union moved to dismiss both actions on January 27,3004, for
failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(b)(6). In response, Plaintiffs submitted their
{00068970; l; 0040-3}
l