Free Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 26.6 kB
Pages: 4
Date: November 23, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 830 Words, 5,212 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22962/32.pdf

Download Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Connecticut ( 26.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-01032-SRU

Document 32

Filed 11/24/2004

Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : ONE PARCEL OF PROPERTY : LOCATED AT 62 CUTLER STREET, : NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT, : WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND : IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, AND : : Defendant. : : [CLAIMANTS: ROBERT A. VENTURINI, : JR., ADAM T. HYDE, STATE OF : CONNECTICUT, CITY OF NEW : LONDON] :

Civil No. 3:03CV1032(SRU)

November 23, 2004

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST ROBERT A. VENTURINI, JR. The United States of America, hereby moves for Default Judgment, and represents as follows: On June 11, 2003, a Verified Complaint of Forfeiture was filed for the forfeiture of the Defendant, one parcel of property located at 62 Cutler Street, New London, Connecticut, with all appurtenances and improvements thereon ("Defendant Property"). The Complaint alleges that the Defendant Property was used or intended to be used in any manner or part to commit or to facilitate the commission of a violation of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq., and is therefore subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) On June 18, June 25, and July 2, 2004, notice of this action was published in the Hartford Courant newspaper. On June 25, 2003, Robert A. Venturini, Jr. was personally served by the United States

Case 3:03-cv-01032-SRU

Document 32

Filed 11/24/2004

Page 2 of 4

Marshals Service with the Verified Complaint of Forfeiture, Lis Pendens, Notice of Complaint of Forfeiture against Real Property, and proposed Writ of Entry. No claim, answer or other defense having been filed by pro se Claimant Robert A. Venturini, Jr. in this case as required by Rule C(6) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, the United States moved to default by Robert A. Venturini, Jr., and all other persons and entities, except the City of New London, the State of Connecticut, and Adam T. Hyde for failure to defend. On August 20, 2003, the Clerk of the Court granted the United States of America's request and defaulted Robert A. Venturini, Jr. On September 18, 2003, the United States of America filed a Motion to Set Aside Default entered against Robert A. Venturini, Jr. stating that the parties had reached an agreement in the case and were in the process of formalizing that agreement. On September 22, 2003, the Court granted the United States of America's Motion to Set Aside Default entered against Robert A. Venturini, Jr. On October 10, 2003, the United States Marshals Service personally served Robert A. Venturini, Jr. with the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement. Mr. Venturini refused to execute the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement. On or about March 31, 2004, Plaintiff received a letter from Robert A. Venturini, Jr., indicating that he was now represented by Attorney Anthony Basilica in this case and the related civil forfeiture case United States v. 171 Lincoln Avenue, New London, Connecticut, Civil No. 3:03CV1033(SRU). In his letter, Mr. Venturini indicated that he would sign the original settlement agreement.

2

Case 3:03-cv-01032-SRU

Document 32

Filed 11/24/2004

Page 3 of 4

On or about April 28, 2004, Plaintiff's counsel provided Attorney Anthony Basilica, with the Stipulations for Compromise Settlement for the two civil forfeiture cases. On numerous occasions between April 28, 2004, and November 18, 2004, Plaintiff's counsel contacted Attorney Basilica regarding the settlement of the civil forfeiture cases. On October 28, 2004, the Plaintiff advised counsel for the Claimant that the Government would seek Default Judgments in both civil forfeiture cases if the Stipulations were not returned by November 4, 2004. On November 3, 2004, counsel for the Claimant requested an additional two weeks to return the Stipulations for Compromise Settlement. Plaintiff's counsel agreed to an extension until November 18, 2004. The United States has not yet received the signed Stipulation for Compromise Settlement from the Claimant, and therefore moves for entry of a default judgment in accordance with the Court's default of Robert A. Venturini, Jr. A proposed Default Judgment is submitted herewith. Respectfully submitted, KEVIN J. O'CONNOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

DAVID X. SULLIVAN ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY P.O. BOX 1824 NEW HAVEN, CT 06508 (203) 821-3700 FEDERAL BAR # ct03793

3

Case 3:03-cv-01032-SRU

Document 32

Filed 11/24/2004

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a copy of the within and foregoing Motion for Default Judgment Against Robert A. Venturini, Jr., has been mailed, postage prepaid, this 23rd day of November, 2004 to: Robert A. Venturini, Jr. MacDougall - Walker Correctional Institution 1153 East Street, South Suffield , CT 06080 Mark Solak, Esq. Devine & Associates One Exchange Place, 6th Floor Waterbury, CT 06702 Brian K. Estep, Esq. Conway & Londregan, P.C. 38 Huntington Street New London, CT 06320 Richard R. Brown, Esq. Brown, Paindiris & Scott 100 Pearl Street, Suite 1100 Hartford, CT 06103 Anthony R. Basilica, Esq. 37 Granite Street New London, CT 06320

DAVID X. SULLIVAN ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY

4