Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. I . · I
Case 3:03-cv-00979-JCH Document 9 Filed 10/28/2003 Pa§é0106@l7‘i1l/O,7('é’.l(tl'l M2
‘ “ O I I
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT counr Ty? ·` I _. l
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT `I “ L " A E
I
JESUS ROSA ) CASE N0- EQIP UC l` P U Q !?= l
Plaintiff ) 3:03CV9'/9(JCJg)/"L‘" J " " 2 l
> I I “
) MOTION ON CONSENT FOR · · I — l
) EXTENSION OF TIME T0 ’ I
v. ) COMPLY WITH RULE 26(I) I
) AND EXTEND DISCOVERY I
IIARTE NISSAN, INC. ) DEADLINES *
Defendant ) I _ l
) October 22, 2003 _ i
Pursuant to Rule 7(b) ofthe Rules ofthe United States District Court for the District of ‘ 5
W · l N_\Connecticut, as amended, the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter hereby moves for an extension of
I
\ we of twenty (20) days from the date hereof, or to and including November 1 1, 2003, to comply with
El l'§ed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and further moves for an extension of the discovery deadlines in the standing order l
& \ I
Q - of three (3) months, to and including January 21, 2004. Good cause exists for the granting of this motion I
\
3 as followsn I l
cn ‘
L idk The instant case was incorrectly entered in Plaintiff’ s counsel’s tracking system and the
. . I I lil, ‘ ‘
J deadline to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(i) (July 30, 2003) was unintentionally missed.
> *5; I
§ R ». -The 26(f) Report was faxed to Attorney McGrath for review of even date herewith. y
E U 3:3 Due; to the length of time which has transpired since the filing of this suit, Plaintiff further
moves for an extension of three (3) months, to and including January 21, 2004, to complete discovery.
4. Attomey McGrath has agreed and consented to this motion for extension of time. R
’ l
I
A K
S
I
i
I ml