Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 52.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: January 22, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 321 Words, 2,067 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22902/23.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 52.3 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
`..~-——---- o
l B * Case 3:03-cv-00972-JCH Document 23 Filed O1/16/200§.c“VFBan§<.$$*»1”i>¢1»~!`i um)-,
~ ** QA , ll l
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT `
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUMUU JAN {
g 3 A in rt,
\ __ TIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, : U3 {gf y
\ § l ¤ FlF?ts"i‘:i¥'r?‘ E i VL? tl I -
X § A s Plaintmi : M '°""‘¥{`)"ill`l
\$\ S- : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03cv972 (ICH) Q? S
N ‘ >GE FANUC AUTOMATION Q
Q FORPORATION, :
i Defendant. January 12, 2004 i
I r
g JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME I
§ \J The undersigned counsel for Plaintifii Otis Elevator Company ("Otis") and Defendant,
\\& GE Fanuc Automation Corporation ("GE Fanuc"), hereby jointly request a postponement ofthe 1
oral argument on Otis’ Petition to Compel Arbitration ("Petition"), currently scheduled for
Q Januag 26,,2004, for a period of approximately one month. The reason for this request is that
I CD V 1 .
mOtis would lilte to depose William Zitelli, a former GE Fanuc employee who resides in
§ if-i·=l7’em·ls_y£lv:;1nia@tl GE F anuc would like to depose Robert Gaboury, a former Otis employee who *
···· fri Ls,.l
§ % ""liias reéntlyilgieighn new employment. These witnesses have indicated their willingness to
\ coopege an§submit to depositions, but they are not available until early February, due to pre-
§ existing commitments. 1
Counsel for Otis and GE Fanuc believe that these depositions will allow them to present a ,
Q ¥
complete evidentiary record at the time of a hearing on Otis’ Petition. Although certain
® aftidavits have been filed as exhibits to memoranda in support of and in opposition to Otis’
Q Petition to Compel Arbitration, the parties believe that depositions of Mr. Zitelli and Mr.
Gaboury will delve into the issues of this dispute, i.e., whether there was an agreement to
s·§ N
§§
TA;;-;:;;£ Q1 ;-is?7*7-%:75;*;%-ry-3-;r.f_-i J; J; T _ f _ H _--*7i