Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00968-WIG Document 62-2 Filed O3/05/2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT '
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY i
Civil Action
~vs~ _
#3:03 CV 96B(RNC) ·
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY
OF BRIDGEPORT, ET AL.
The deposition of ANITA FALCO, Q
taken on behalf of the Plaintiff,
pursuant to notice and rules of court, F
M
before Stephen F. Bernfeld, a Notary gi
Public of the State of Connecticut, on h
Â¥%
the 22nd day of December, 2003, at gy
‘ I
12 noon, at the law offices of Bridgeport gg
Housing Authority, 505 Trumbull Street, Q
Bridgeport, Connecticut. E
Â¥
ii
i
i
Ei
Q
s
STEPHEN F. BERNFELD é
Licensed Professional Reporter 5
5 Three Trees Lane 5
Trumbull, CT 066ll—l729 E
(203) 26B—5693 g
License #SHR.285 §
li
., , .. ·•e··••»~¤· ··~•·1· ·'

EXhib¥“f 1 ‘‘,." .€> _.`.
ia
m_ is j

Case 3:03-cv-00968-WIG Document 62-2 Filed O3/05/2004 Page 2 of 4
62
l wouldn't be on the November list.
2 Q Okay. Feel free to look at any of the waiting
3 lists that we've got.
4 A Okay.
5 No, she moved. She's not in here, in any of
6 these. She leased up September 27th. She moved in
7 September 17th. So, on September 25th, she wouldn't be
8 on the waiting list.
9 Q Okay. Do you remember whether she was elderly
l0 or not?
ll A I believe she's elderly.
12 Q Okay. was the person to whom you offered unit
13 C10 elderly?
14 A I don't think so. I think he was disabled.
15 Q And, can you tell using the exhibits that we
16 have before us, tell on what date he first applied?
17 A Let me take a look in here.
18 (PAUSE}
19 A I don’t find the number for —~
20 Q When you say "this list," you mean Plaintiff's
21 Exhibit 14, correct?
22 A Yes.
23 Q And that is the list for September?
24 A September 30th, yes.
25 Q So, why would the person to whom you offered a
Steve Bernfeld, LSR
(203} 268—5693

Case 3:03-cv-00968-WIG Document 62-2 Filed O3/05/2004 Page 3 of 4
63
l unit in October not be on that list?
2 A I really don't know.
3 Oh, I offered to him on August 22nd, and he
4 moved in October 3rd.
5 Q So, in fact, you didn't offer it to him at
6 all. Because you didn't start offering units until
7 August 28th, correct?
8 A No, obviously I offered ·— I was wrong.
9 Because I have, my writing on July 30th. So, that must
iD have been when I was offering.
ll Q So, now you're saying you were offering units
12 as of July 30th?
I3 A Yes. So I must have been incorrect when I
14 stated August 22nd. It must have been July 22nd when I
15 came over to applications.
i6 I’m sorry.
I? Q Does that change your answer about how many
18 units at Fireside you have offered?
l9 A No.
20 Q It seems like it might, since before you were
21 going off of Plaintiff's Deposition Exhibit I3 in
22 telling me which units you had offered.
23 A No, because I have my handwriting here. I
24 recall the families.
25 Q So, you're certain that the previous list of
Steve Bernfeld, LSR
(203) 268-5693

Case 3:03-cv-00968-WIG Document 62-2 Filed 03/05/2004 Page 4 of 4
69
1 comes back to haunt you.
2 MS. VICKERY: I'm sure she’s just
3 answering to the best of her ability.
4 MR. MAHAR: E’m just reaffirming the
5 instructions.
6 Q were you ever involved in decisions about who
7 would be offered a unit at the Fireside before July 22,
8 2003?
9 A No.
10 Q Okay. We're turning to the list of units that
ll yeu have offered. Was the person to whom you offered
12 unit G2 of the Fireside an elderly person?
13 A No, not an elderly person.
14 MR. MAHAR: G2.
15 A G2.
16 Q And was that person a disabled person?
ll A Yes.
18 Q And do you remember how eld that person is?
19 A Approximate, I believe it's 47. ?orty~seven
20 year~old.
21 Q Okay. Was the person to whom you offered unit
22 C10 an elderly person?
23 A Yes. And that was a transfer.
24 Q Okay. And was the person to whom you offered
25 unit A1 an elderly persen?
Steve Bernfeld, LSR
(203) 268—5693