Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Q ‘ I • • O':5C.V°i68‘P*`\0é¥.\` rsp VP
I
l
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ ~ E
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY on behalf 2
of himself and all other : 5 2
similarly situated ; .
: »'l·“"“' I
Plaintifh : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03 CV 968 (RNC) g
= l
V. 2 l
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY i
OF BRIDGEPORT, ET AL. :
Defendants.
l
I
` . E
g '”-] MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST l
_ Q REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
fg , i__ The undersigned Defendants, Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport, Collin Vice,
$4 — I
2 I §nd Jonas DeGuzman, respectfully move this Court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 34 and
U] -¤-I i
_ E * Conn. Loc. R. Civ. Rule 7 for a thirty day extension of time to respond to the Plaintiffs First
to 0
ig A i zRequests for Production. The Plaintiffs First Requests for Production was served on the
M l
cg l , Ejbefendants on October I3, 2003 and consists of eight production requests. The additional time
` E .-Q ·;"·-ti -
Q Sis requiredfto gather; and review the requested information.
0 ..
N at _ In support of this motion, the undersigned represents that on October 28, 2003, he spoke,
M I
$ via telephone, with Attorney Jennifer Vickery, counsel for the Plaintiff Attorney Vickery
ig indicated that she objects to an extension of time. This is the first motion for extension of time
Z
Z l
. I
. l