Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Cimvsl l
DlrSl`V`lC—l c>l—` Cmhnccllhw-l
JQYYW-5 lT`l(—l<\”¤v"¤0n Cl\lll~ N0, $°ZC>3<;\/'Qilkl l
V· QM;) (Omg
\/OYHHE, C.C>l TT " ' l
§¤mC»¤ ghég fl UH'- l
Qlxgll l]e<;e;¤rvxl>€*F 7, ,;2()Oq ;
QQUWE. l—{u$k;>Cmcl l
llllca Dcmclvcm l
jim/I Tcllj l C>Y‘
DC?-p€\QC.lOm—l_ .IY'WCl\l/l*C>lLJOll CQQqq`;`l`;9/
m€mC)lKQmOlUW] Ol) LQUUTQ $UP9O‘?¥` I
$¤m¤~<~`*’ J¤<4 lDlOlV\`-l\°l;\l—\ l)Y\Cl€K`Svl` \ I ` T " ~
UWNE €lrF<;l@nc€; welghgllfllxé €Vl£:CilT€D€/TGE; ¤lJc?l`l;» l
_\’€V` We (g>urT$ Pcnlci Uncle? Rule Slo KE lg n(;w~p,;, ly ]· ·C_ l
l;<>aC455c$§1n9.) The TlM*@$l·»c.lcl l$$u@ ol? W)h.·;Th<:v` cl ~;:1§ihl;Yl`ii)d l
<_L><¢STS as Y0 m0~T¢Pt`G»l l;\c1€TS Pcpuiflnqj qTn{°Q\_, (glcclgc S€,€_ C l
lq nclevswn \/. l"lb€(i‘Y‘_l- Y, l`OlC>l.Yf IHC. dr`l_l lll} lQL[q/ l l
lO(p. QTQSOS QSIOJ QlL.ED2c>;zQ¤1%6,}. ) j il
Q . I ° · “ I R l
QODCQTEQZESSS l'i\CA\!C {Z`>r*e$€¤Tcicl C>ll>50luT<‘;
l U acme} 0swe.\\;x $ ST<:`Tcvfc>lcJT2m$·.
p1m·.»J®¤ i l
{ · ll J-§;;q@·5 L'*'L( ln/l ;'\V](?}’7 l


n l
` ` Case 3:03-cv-00944-RNC Document 44-2 Fi|ed12/17/2004 Page20f2
» h
N §
3.0m Jwméxgoos `nq P Tn, . 5
On Q nqemn TIG ‘) · C ` QC CT cl EPCVWCXCAVWT OiYV1\N—€([
YY} N, Ov E UU €£1>ST€‘{` COV`¥"C?€_Tl¤CJY\CLxl pCAK up YH
OU<§j)>q Coil cicmévxmaochum iv~.Pc>r*mc[Y¤`0m WMQT MOS NET R
{Om ' amazed or P€.|•:ic¤$@_ Tc; Dae <;l€-;gi>c».¤"`\“mc<¤`Yc>{?(Lq>v~r~»_<;;,`{`.`.
` }
F
P¢<:m?FP L
Bjv QCAANL.
J-Omcs {cc YV\€\fv\r1c;»M I
N
i