Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

--i_
Case 3:03-cv—00612—RNC Document 13 Filed 11/19/2003 Page 1 of 1 '
_ ,,, 1____ Bc U tal L y>~,lt»·2.v»i{ {
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the {
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT rg; {
gra
. .»·-* .»·* ' _
ROBERT R. CARLSON, ; n. $@1 -·° {
Plaintiff] : CIVIL NO. 303CVO@’>);(RNC§l {
° mg *9 {
V. : -*.22 on
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES :
oRoUP,1Nc. ;
Defendant. : November 17, 2003
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
6 IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES AND
{5 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS {
E Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this {
§ourt, the Defendant, Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., respectfully requests a tideen ‘
ro on
2 'QKIS) day extension of time, up to and including December 2, 2003 in which to respond and/or Q
rv as I
~¤ .c: ,
Q Uobject to Plaintiffs First Request for Interrogatories and Production dated September 18, 2003.
*2 jln support of this Motion, the Defendant provides the following:
rp; ` .§ 1. P- Pursuant to the Court’s Case Management Plan dated July 2, 2003, the {
4.: - Bd {
E · deadline for Discovery is March 15, 2004.
cn E
FO i___2. The Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories are comprised of fourteen (14)
Q .lI1I6l`I‘O§:tftlZO1`1EI§1;£I-l-III Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents is comprised of thirty one
E?. M ·:e# il. {ge é
_ i_(31) requests forgrocurnent production. 3
2 .A.. {gig {
u — . .; gg},
w rf; M". I
ig ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
5 {
= {
{
{
;=—;%;a;;—_¢—,;esaaes—E&m.t.sr,,;.¤.....esm,.,,._.,.: n -:-1f-I F `J `C