Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv—00583-JCH Document 90-2 Filed 08/30/2005 Page1 0f2
EXHIBIT A

I C 3:03- - - ` · .
_ A A Aase . cv 00583 JCH Document 90-2 Filed 08/30/2005 Page 2 of 2 » .
A _ . ‘ ~ CONN (NEW HAVEN) _
· - _ _ - ‘ 03-cv-583 - _ I V .
J _ . Hall, J. _ `A_.
` ( F I » , -V`· United States Court of Appeals I I 3 » R i I I
. . _ ron rm; ‘ * - .
‘A A ° . _ SECOND CIRCUIT _ _ A __
. . ~ At a stated. Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second - _ V
L _A A . Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse at Foley Square, A - · ‘
_ _ AA ‘ ‘ ia the City of New York, on the i7H`day of /}ugg.;“// two thousand and iive,'_ · I "
A . Presenti .' A _ ‘ - V A A — ‘ l l ` VA A l A A A
_ I . A A _ " Hon. Rosemary S. Pooler, S _A -.
A A A . F A A Hon. Robert D. Sack, _ _ . _;;§§i?/ _ _
· ` A ° i. Hon. Sonia Sotomayor, _ ‘ ` ‘ mg it `j @@5 EZ) l A
· » _ . Circuit Judges. E E., ’ _ {gy l
» A . __ ":¢·`*?`Gi·go eV°~@·* .___
- Luis Fernandez, ` _ A · `
. ' Plaintiff-Appellant, ' AMENDED ORDER . A
.i I ( v. ‘ · A 05-11634pr
. John J. Armstrong, etal., l ‘ n A V `
» » - » · Defendants-Appellees. `
Appellant, pro se, moves for assignment of counsel,. informa pauperis status, permission to file A
I an overlong brief with appendix, "objection [and] opposition to defendant's memorandum dated `
· 5/27/O5," "correction of judgment," and "the appeal to be heard on the full record and to be A ·
i - A I _ allowed to present oral argument." Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the motions are
DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED because it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. See
28 U.S.C. ·§ l915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989). A· _ A ·
I · FOR THE COURT: V -
- . A ‘ Roseann Maclieclmie, Clerk
” . A . By: , A £,y@) ,/AA; g f _ .
A A Oliva M. eorge, Deputy Clerk
I M, ( 7, 2%%. J
A SAO/JE · i I _ l A