Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

[ l rr"? mu"- -é-.-...-......._
l · · Case 3:03-cv-OO55E§g_PCD Document 19 Filed 12/1 Z{2003 Page 1 of { I
E ~ ‘ · ‘ lg,) FF G
i l r. r-..;» ""{"‘§
l ` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT gi, _ ;j;;;; i
Nr i DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT $4;. {ii-Q ·’ 2.,1 g
el l rm l
N. THOMAS K. vER1>oc1<, ; *_`. l
J : ` " (,;..w {
Plaintiff, : p l
l` : N . 3:03CV0556 PCD l
l N .. . 0 < were i
léxi : l
EMSAR, INC., : December 1, 2003 ·
l · :
lg Defendant. : i
ug _ : :
Qi zi ·
$3 REVISED MOTION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING DEADLINES
Pursuant t0 Rule 7(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, the Defendant l
‘ F
4;* § L Emsar, Inc. respectfully requests that the scheduling deadlines incorporated in the parties' Rule
26(f) report be extended to provide that discovery shall be completed by February 27, 2004,
Q if dispositive motions shall be filed by March 28, 2004, and if no dispositive motions are filed, the I
\: { _
seg case shall be ready for trial by April 15, 2004. In support of this motion, the Defendant
ig represents: p
-; · Y ,
This motion is tiled to supplement and amend the November 26, 2003 i
ritz: if
gg Motippyto liixteniii. yy;
E. {___ The undersigned has spoken to Attorney Andrew I-Ioulding, representing
QQ ` the Plaintifigiéirdlhghas no objection to the granting of this motion.
~& ~¤ l
Z?. lp 3. The parties each previously requested one extension of time to respond to F
*"\
T-: TE the opposing party‘s interrogatories and requests for production.
4. The current schedule provides that discovery shall be completed by i
?§ November 28, 2003, dispositive motions shall be filed by January 15, 2004, and if no dispositive {
“~.»
Q3} motions are filed, the case is to be ready for trial by January 30, 2004. ,
l
I
i
l
!
r i
ni _.._........_......,......._ .... ml