Free Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 55.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: February 23, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 311 Words, 2,230 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22561/54.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 55.8 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut
e"*“*rri“*l“‘l—*"‘"r‘"t‘"""“r""‘*·—······_*—·`·»I___
. ~I, Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Docume`iTl*54 Filed O2/20/2004% C._|§’,apeL1}9i,})@0]£-O {
cx", »»·*· , w / 44 .
l A IQ I (3 (D 0 O ’?> eu *-blt-Ll»Ex)rxm€€<¤'\`O
ia r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ,— »· __ __
ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC., : ` Fill T I
ein, _C j __]
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 303`CV0444 j . - Ea `
c‘:· I (Nl ,
vs. : E/OJFJ _?
WEED INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC., :
and HARCO LABORATORIES, INC., :
Defendants. : FEBRUARY 4, 2004
pl DEFENDANT’S MOTION- FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
g REGARDING SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM SERVED ON GLEN BEATTY
0
i I
3 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(cz), Defendant Harco Laboratories, Inc. y
Q ("I-Iarco") respectfully moves for entry of a Protective Order regarding the Subpoena Duces `
=¤=
B3 Tecum served on non-party Glen Beatty (“Beatty") on February 2, 2004, by Plaintiff Rosemount I
'U
gil Aerospace, Inc. (“Rosemount") (Exhibit A): (a) limiting the documents requested from Beatty to i
U] .
S I those conceming the total air temperature (“TAT") sensor, which is the only product that
U l
s~I - I
3 Rosemount has identified with specificity in its First Amended Complaint (Exhibit B) as
U ‘ ` 3 tt I
misapp"i·fopriated_ by Harco, its employee Brad Powell ("Powell") and former Weed employees I
Q Li"} e ., ., ` (
E _ _ wfdrked;-for}Harco, including Beatty; (b) providing Harco with adequate opportunity to
·~ CI
Q $4% wreiviewxaiid object to doctunents Beatty intends to produce, before production to Rosemount, to I
»-—§- -r=} gévoid disclosure of I-Iarco’s confidential trade secret infomation about products
—-.¤. is it 2
. we I
HE- E}-gthat do not relate to the TAT sensor; and (c) requiring Plaintiff to comply with the Federal Rules I
an . _
I
I
ST:27734vl
. I
H., ..,,, ,, ,, W _P-

;=~·»t» ·- U -r-L-,,;.,_,€., ¥_,_’H _’_=_+___ _ _