Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

—————--4 ~»--;—- -?-»~—x"w..... ....; ...A.t...JQ ...- 4,....4
. ‘ Case 3:03-cv-OO444-AWT Document 34 Filed 2/15/ 003 Page 1 of 4
p I ZHUJUISUI5 engl,} I
II" I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO RT JI·I)r'I`f?I!I`é`E(%RfgLULIRT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICU ’ CI I
ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC., : I I
Plaintiff : Civil Actio No. 3 3C\/0444 I
vs. : `
WEED INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC., :
and HARCO LABORATORIES, INC., : _
Defendants. : DECEMB R E12, 2 03 I
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENS O; O II E I
Defendant Harco Laboratories, Inc. ("Harco") moves fo an ext nsion of time for serving
responses to the discovery requests of Plaintiff Rosemount A rospac , Inc., pursuant to Local
Rule 7(b), with respect to the Plaintiffs First Set of Reque tsi for ocuments, First Set of
Interrogatories and Second Set of Requests for Documents. I I
Harco’s responses to the Plaintiff s First Set of Interro atories and First Set of Request
for Documents were originally due on December l, 2003. 'I osemo nt consented to adjourn
those responses until December 31, 2003. Harco’s responses toi the laintiff’ s Second Set of
Requests for Documents is due on December 15, 2003.
Harco requests that its time to respond to the First A Se ond Set of Requests be
extended until January 9, 2004, The Harco representative prim rily res onsible for coordinating E
I
I
ST:27373vl
. I
lg- H H if '``‘‘ c‘ ·e·e-~- -.
,_ iiif f‘t‘‘ reseeesasas

I I I ` ```` i
‘ l Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 34 Filed 2/15/ 003 Page 2 of 4 |
responses to the Rosemount discovery requests has been trave ing out ide Connecticut and will
not return until December 22, 2003. As a result of vacatio sche ules and the intervening _
holidays of Christmas and New Year, it will not be possible to · omplet the discovery responses
as of the dates presently scheduled. The present time limit ions ct not reasonably be met, j
l
despite the diligence of Harco. This is the first request for an e I tension of time to respond to the
Plaintiffs Second Set of Requests for Documents. The brief a `ournm nt will not prejudice any
. l
parties. The Plaintiffs motion seeking leave to file its First A ended ( omplaint was granted on
December 5, 2003, and no depositions in this action have been t ken.
The undersigned conferred with Rosemounfs cou sel o ncoming the requested
adjournment and received qualified consent that has not been re olved, hereby necessitating this
motion. Accordingly, Harco respectfully requests that its Mo ion for an extension of time be
I
I
granted. l
EPSTEIN BEC I Rt& I' [EN, P.C.
David . oppick, sq. (#1 02)
Attomeys for Defe dant
HARCO LABO · T(i)RlE , INC.
One Landmark Sq are, 18tI Floor
Stamford, CT 069 II _
(203) 348-3737
. and
S'l`:27373vl 2 ¥
R l
——···‘—*_—"——‘“““““ _`ll_"""il_l;l E "“"

, ' Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 34 Filed 2/15/ 003 Page 3 of 4
WISE & WISE 1 » f
Robert B. Wise, E q.Q
Attorneys for Defe dtmt
HARCO LABO TORI S, INC.
1100 Summer Stre t
Stamford, CT 069 5. 1
(203) 359-8877

1 1
1
- 1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
S'l`;27373vl 3
w_._,_____...................,1._..._......,_._.._3;_.1_1 .m___1

..~. --....-.--. .... .....-..................h.. .... ......II,.,,.,.,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,_ ` . _.,I ,_... .. . ' f.,.,.,,,., , l
__ . · Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 34 Filed 2/15/ 003 Page 4 of 4
I I
I
I
I
I
CERTIFICATION `
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy ofthe for goiing as sent, viaregular mail, I
this 12m day of December 2003, to:
Daniel W. McDonald Esq. (ct23281) (
William D. Schultz, Esq.(ct25198) I
Merchant & Gould PC ‘ I
3200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2215 _ I
Telephone: (612) 332-5300
Facsimile: (612) 332-9081
James Mahanna, Esq. (ct2468l)
Day, Berry & Howard LLP .
CityPlace 1 I
Hartford, CT 06103-3499
Telephone: (860) 275-0100 ‘
Facsimile: (860) 275-0343
, I
@2%/ $» is- -’. I
David S. Poppick l'
I
I
I
srzvmvi 4 I
.. .I.. ..-I