Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l m`w-·-;-I"` l
H Case 3:03-cv-00442-SRU Document 9 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 1 of 3 l
z
1 . 1
Q_ Tresser Boulevard Apt. 8F
1 Q " [Stamford, CT 06901 t
l U Em] UH; I b mD§cember 3, 2003 l
Q. United States District Court _ SLI
2 _ District of Connecticut UQ jj a.·· l I`- I a
p MABEL CHISHOLM A I
CASE NO. 3:03 CV442 (SRU)
"· a
QQ MEDICARE, et al. l
This is in response to notice to counsel L
The court has reviewed my case and decided to dismiss my case for not complying with
Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. i
Q I do agree that the 120 days after the filing ofthe complaint, have passed and an executed
· return of service has not been filed in this case.
- The reason for all the confusion is simply a lack of counsel to represent me
1 I have gone to over twenty Attorneys in the State of Connecticut, and New York trying to
I get help, but someone is always blocking me from getting one because of the atrocity of
· the crime that was committed against me, and these are federal crimes.
ii There are still other reasons for the delays that can be verified as facts: l
1.) I did have an attorney who took my papers and held them for over two months J
and retumed them back in the middle of my trial. )
2.) The court itself caused the first delay in the processing of the papers.
1 3.) The State of Connecticut violated Federal Laws by not adequately protecting
The Elderly and The Disabled. This is a criminal offense. They violated my
Constitutional Rights, my Civil Rights, and my Human Rights to exist as a `
Human Being; and I can’t get an attorney to handle any of these charges. This
I
l
l

1....... ....
-.ss.»2i Ji Q ··· ———e —l?`¥ZLZIZffii

-.·;i Ji _ or ee-- -Z¥¥IIIiIi`f?i


I I
Case 3:03-cv-00442-SRU Document 9 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 2 of 3
|
I
I seems unusual in any country so I hereby ask the court to appoint counsel to I
I handle this case and get someone who won’t be prejudice, but will handle all
I matters in a decent and satisfactory manner. I
4.) Plaintiffs also would like to ask that the newly appointed Attorney be given I
I
extra time to pick up from here and proceed to serve the summons to each
Defendant as in compliance with Rule 4 (m) of The Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
Dated today in Stamford, Connecticut This 3rd day of December 2003. This notice was
received November 25th.
3 Q E I
Respectfully submitted by:
MABEL c1—11sHoLM, Plaintiffs
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
“Lr·“‘·:="II I

i Case 3:03-cv-00442-SRU Document 9 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 3 of 3
I Clerk U.S. District Court
us. courthouse c/isa No; 3:O3CV442 (SRU) 1
915 LaFayette Boulevard 1
Bridgeport, CT 06604 l
1 t
1 I1
1 1
1 1
1

—m—o‘1"11