Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

.... ...1.-.- ........ uon.....lE._u_. l A
_ _ K Case 3:03-cr—OO$FlNC Document 112 Filed O&[_59/2%,%/ A§%6#F
O E ei
\ s
GJ U Q l
0 "’ 5 ui
-¤ .5 d ·
*·’ U D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-I-I C: CL ..
5 E E 5 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT '
g § Q Fl E H"
-.-1 M U . ’ 1
`“' Q 5 § " ZITED STATES OF AMERICA : No | ¤*= C)
L] LJ (U .< A 423
H FQ O ..: U1 1:::r;5~r
C r ‘°· Iii rv··1·.mzu
<;> Q LD`-~·~l QL:
ng IU 01 g O Q..Y" ""` Edmfvn
is E OO. Q Jtusrmo FLEURY ; JANtrlt§iv19E 200%%]
¤ O . l;i‘!`""'| j)
. D4 .-Cl N . ____' (jj
*1 ¤> B — i»t—¤><.s 1
E 5 Q 2 1 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FORIJUIQY SELECTION l
3 L1-l O U ··~l QQ
TG E E Q The Defendant, acting herein by his undersigned counsel, hereby moves the Court 'for'an
--1 $ 3 0 l
B E 3 enlargement of time for jury selection. The date currently scheduled is February 7, 2005.
>~ 1: -1 cu
'U - . . . . 1
gq J; gg The undersigned was only recently appointed m this matter, due to a conflict of interest
ui
rn 0 as is
· · . l
fs E § § which became apparent to previous counsel, and was able to pick up the tile shortly before the
u.1 »¤ *1 $-1
O *" - - . . .
E, gw § _Q Christmas holidays; Counsel has not had the opportunity to visit the Defendant, although he
.,.l '*’l Ll-t {jj
E L3 rg § will be doing so on the date of this Motion. Counsel Q aware that there have been on~going
U -·-I ·-U ‘
O $-1 Q
gi 3 $,,,2 discussions between both prior attorneys and the Government about the possibility of a I
E cl cu E
“’ -¤ . . . . . ·
E ;’ Q1 resolution of the case short of trial, and will pursue those discussions as soon as possible. i
¤ i.> 0: “’ o
Q, § 5 E It is requested that the date for jury selection be continued four (4) weeks beyond February
LJ 'U ·
U to ui
ENE § E 7, 2005, or until March 7, 2005, or to the next available date subsequent to that. The
o eu sa U
¤ ¤ U . . . .
tg g1 5% Government has no objection to the granting of this request. There have been earlier such
cu si
an GJ m
g lj E Q Mo@ns Enlargement tiled by predecessor counsel, and this is the second tiled by the
E ERE' tj undeciui ndaccl;3 I
s QQ fig git.
‘“ V .. -·· ‘ . . . .
U E; E Ctgnselggglz discuss on the date of this Motion with the Defendant the need for a Speedy
ur >~. tn; W l zi
Q, fg Q 5 nal Waiveféiand it is anticipated that one will be executed and mailed to the Clerk's office
N ¤» M M wz ec
t 5 O 2 `ée » »-·s 2 . .
2 E Li M later on"The date of this Motion.
|i0i|
W 3 . . .
rd -.-1 .-1 U
::1 JJ 01 ·
d SC “? ·
li ·r*1 JJ ID l
F_T_F_F_` 5 1 at .... _ Z . _. .. _. __ _ ...., ,__ . .
- i -7 n Y __ I TT _;é; ‘- 7 `;—l ‘;3;§¤-'-1=·>;,L.:;_;,__;_:_.__,,;:L_;_=f;;_:;
_»_—F_`T_T ‘ T . T ,. _..._ _ . . , .. ._ _. _ ..r__ __._ . _
—- v V - - I ` wr-