Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ . . .... r ---..urm----..--..,--r.-.--..2..-“...aW-.._-...--.-;“,r......m....._._..._........._......_...c_........
6 ` ` ase 3:03-cr—OO198—_BNC Document 798 Filed 12/13/2004 Page 1 of 1
" ` C5 I)
\._
l -%
WS UNITED STATES DIS .
· tn.
A §u,g¤ FORTHE MM-
_g 1`A3 B U DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
§`B‘s·$ ZUUHUEC I0 Miss
U4 0 #-1
m • ·•~· *$·‘“""•Ir\ 1 r1‘
mg _ ·r* ‘"‘‘‘'''““''''“''''‘“”''''''''““”'''''‘“““‘ " ‘‘‘‘‘**‘ X :,i_§y_ 1];;, 5 5-;;t_,T {_,Qliltl
. .5 jj § 3 fZf~.Ti3ii'i:'iEiiiiL Cl.
p E E, M gg UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
E u (U UE I
y i`?·§ §t§ Plaintiff
l QU G, 8 '°’ CRIMINAL MATTER
hi? E) if VS. NO. 3:03CR—l98 (RNC)
eae§
H .,.g ·m A
¤·‘ mu *0 g
:>
l tg E Ei ANTONIO MARRERO, December 8, 2004
l Eta:
Ei Fi up M Defendant
4-* ;3 3 8 F---"-"nu--“--nnnn-n---mn--nn"nun--X
Ssee
7* as
-1:: ” ¤
U1 U E 3
rf Ei § gg ¤ MOTION TO CONTINUE JURY SELECTION
Ll-I U1
O rn M _
g§;§
.,.| SJ g pj
FI 4 tt . 1 Defendant Antonio Marrero, in the above ca tioned criminal matter, throu h counsel,
.,_, Fg E . ` , P S
»§ Si · respectfully moves the Court hereby to continue the date for jury selection in this case Hom
:1 Q;
·r·l JJ ,,
§: ‘"' E the currently assigned date of Tuesday, December 14, 2004, until the Court’s jury selection
” l` >Z " ·=
'g *0 'g,‘ Q date during the month of February of 2005. In support of this motion, the defendant
{U be Ei M
n -·—¤
g K, E m provides as follows:
-.-4 GJ O '
:> o ' "G
ifi ig} § § I. On November 17, 2004, defendant appeared before the Court, United States
-r1 Ul _ ..¤
J3 Sl ,.i Z 0 Magistrate Judge Donna Martinez, to change his plea in this case and enter a plea of guilty.
·'·’ "j Ll ·—¤ 0
ii lll 3 U] Very close to the conclusion of the plea proceeding, during that portion of the plea where
PQ ‘f"`I ix. D
rg Lb ll ig E defendant allocates as to those facts o·r events that make him guilty of the crime to which he
qi GJ
M °+ ¤· ” . . . . . .
§ E ‘” if 3 1S pleadmg, defendant responded m a way that made 1t apparent that he could not contmue his ,
gases O V
-5 rg lt.; plclga at §>a1;.tirne.
wi I U ·¤ ‘ - cn
3 ij- E § § tj,. { 4 ali C5 Despite efforts by counsel for the defendant and the government on the day of
N a. r
4. c: N N ‘*
6 ¤,_ ttl 3 G; mw théjguiltgplea, it became obvious we would be unable to resurrect the plea at that hearing.
"' FE; ,3 _Q LJ gsi;
u 4. I>—· - · Un `ZJ
§“ 2 Q E r J ·=° t··’.T¤;1‘;;
0 : 'U .52 •--· {iii:
Satat g
~ae It itii
ae2;aaai;ze;zagga;geezaiiaazag
1-Ti.iSj.‘; —,’= “=_·>··€¢ ‘-·· i~é=·j—*=i >:_· :;;.;;{. ag ;;
.;.e L I _. -- .... g
l g -ly, l gpnn g - A