Free Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

` ’*‘_‘—‘"‘“——···-————··-·- .|L..l.J.. `*
I Case 3:03-cv-00232-DFM Document 50-3 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 1 —_
{
l Office of the Attorney General
I STATE OF CONNECTICUT
l \Qe~& e
[ FEBRUARY 1,2006 Y5$‘ ‘
- Mr.Robert B. FISKE.III
y Assistant Attorney General
f Mackenzie Hall
\ 110 sherman street
y Hartford,CT. 06105~2294
J RE:Bourgu1gnon V. BRITO,AND SOUTHwORTH,et al no.3:03cv232 (RNC)
2."2"..:¤=:¤¤:2¤¤¤==l2f.¤¤!Zl¤¤:‘:3=¤$$$'.==3$.'¤¤=.1=£ 1%*7.5;:3322:11L'l::==¤¤¤::==2¤2:
Q
y Dear Mr. Robert,
I am in receipt of your letter dated January 30, 2006,
- please he adviced that I was directed by the court ruling in
order to serve defendants discovery pursuant to the federal
rules of civil procedures, rule 26 through 37 shall be completed
within two months (60 days) OF THE DATE OF THE COURT ORDERED
dated January 5,2006. At this time I want you to disregard all
my outstanding discovery requested before January 24,2006,and
I only want you to answer to my new requests for admlsslon,new
interrogatories,and new productlonn of documents dated January
24, 2006. Please he adviced that failure to respond to my disco-
very requested wlthin 30 days with the court odered dated January
5,2006,wi1l leave me no options but to file a motion to compel
with the court.
I thank you for your full cooperation with the court ordered
dated january 5,2005. —
Respectfully Submitted
Brlstout BOURGUIGNON
N0. 265850
PRO SE
I