Free Order on Motion for Contempt - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 51.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 24, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 279 Words, 1,878 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22072/41.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Contempt - District Court of Connecticut ( 51.1 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Contempt - District Court of Connecticut
I
I 1 . `
1 Case 3:03-cv-00209-QFD Document 41 Fnled 03/23/2004 Page 1 of 2
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT c@`R1,111 1
. E1»..·.h |_____, {
1 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT - 1 1
- ZIIIIII MIR 2`1 ID ?=‘ U2
EECHER A. lL.ARSON, 1 1.J1.‘11._§1?:“1" 1
Plalntlff 11;11i11·~11“1RIT3, I3"1". 1
1 l 1
1
1 — v — civii 1~1¤.3:03cv6209(cFo) (TPS)
5 1 E 1
HORT BEACH RIVER 1 1
1 INA, LLc, ET AL, ~
1 Defendant 1
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1
The defendants' Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to 1
he Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories and Request for
roduction (Dkt. # 39) is GRANTED ABSENT OBJECTION. The defendants
I
ave until March 26, 2004 to respond. 1
1 The plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Dkt. # 24) is GRANTED ABSENT
BJECTION. As such, the court hereby ORDERS the defendant to
espond to the plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and request 1
qor production dated April 22, 2003. At the conclusion of all
roceedings in this case, on application, the court will consider 1
he amount of attorneys' fees, if any, that should be awarded in 1 1
onnection with the plaintiff’s successful pursuit of this motion
. - A 1
ursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1
1
The plaintiff’s Motion for Contempt (Dkt. # 13) is DENIED
%ITHOUT PREJUDICE. That motion can and should be dealt with only
%fter the factual record in this case has been fully developed A
1 1
1 1
1 I 1
....

I
{
! I 2
{ - Case 3:03-cv-00209-CFDt_\ Document 41 Fnled O3/23/2004_ Page 2 of
{ through traditional discovery‘ methods and, {at least arguably,
{ should be addressed by the Judge whose order was allegedly
{ violated. - {
Dated at Hartford, Connecticut this 23m day of March, 2004. {
` - - a¤;2;.L4L& .u¤lII. {
‘ Thomas P. Smith {
{ United States Magistrate Judge .
{ {
{
{
{ {
{
{ {