Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I rrrwnm-—--_--ml "4 r""";tT`i " ‘*" "`*‘“‘ *;";""*‘l"‘·;·_i -———·——-···—-—-—-———··———I—---I-
I _ -,. X Case 3:03-cv-0005§;WWE Document 50 Filed 09/20/2004 Page 1 of 1
I (,,1 O
I
I O R I G I N AL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I DAVID E. CHARDAVOYNE )
) CASE NUMBER:
I Plaintiff ) 03 CV 56 (WWE)
)
I vs. )
I )
THAMES WATER HOLDINGS )
INCORPORATED, THAMES WATER )
NORTH AMERICA INC., )
)
__ Defendants. ) September 7, 2004
" ` REPORT or 1>ART1Es· PLANNING Mnnrrnc Z , I Ii
`.,_’I I _. - ·
IQ ‘
_ Pursuant to Rules l6(b) and 26(D ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Lo”{:}1l Civil .
R I sa»1r
Q \" 26(e) for the District of Connecticut, a conference was held on September ;,3l, 200} The I
Ji" aj I -0 ‘
... $0 xipants were James R. Hawkins II of Finn Dixon & Herling LLP, One Landmark Square, I
—=
35 ford, Connecticut 06901, for plaintiff David E. Chardavoyne (“Plaintiff’) and Jonathan B. .
n . ID
-§` ns, of Zeldes, Needles & Cooper, P.C., 1000 Lafayette Boulevard, Suite 500, Bridgeport, I
5 , ...,.‘ I I
_ 2 E ai l6604, for defendants Thames Water Holdings Incorporated and Thames Water North I
a H -9 S
*" Q
E `§ Ei Q E ica Inc,. ("Defendants").
Q-1 > Lu Q
<·: ?·‘ ·.¤ C
1: g Q Q CERTIFICATION
3 as--
az Q Q W Undersigned counsel certify that, after consultation with their clients, they have discussed
the natureiifand basis of the parties’ claims and defenses and any possibilities for achieving a
prompt settlement or other resolution of the case and, in consultation with their clients, have
developeflthe following proposed case management plan. Counsel further certify that they have I
forvvardeda copy of this report to their clients.
r·Z; H 1 _
iuouszaao, 1, nos-2;
Q
I