Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 49.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 5, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 367 Words, 2,786 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20583/20.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 49.7 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
9 Case 3:02-cv-02132-AWT Document 20 Filed 12/05/200CV •¥·“Pz—!§'§3l’¤6}f 1 " " ' " ‘
c\
l
\ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT t it pig- ,
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ¤ t' g
ROY SASTROM AND itil} MC — 3 P
ROBERT RALMAN ; CIVIL ACTION NO. i
Plointigfv : Docket No. 3i02c?v023,*Q*>2QA?\&f¥F}({I¥FM)
_ __] ,. L._,__;,,_ wr wil', i`
. i!rI.(l;··[j[·;_:_j
V. I
JAMES CASSIDY, FIID., JD., AND i
GARRELL MULLANEY, C.E.o. ;
Defendants : DECEMBER 2, 2003
l
DEFENDANTs’ FIRST MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT
OF TIME TO FILE THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT j
Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 7(b), the defendants, James Cassidy,
Ph.D., J .D., and Garrell Mullaney, C.E.O., move for an enlargement of time to tile their motion `
for summary judgment. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is currently due on
!
December 8, 2003.
l
To date the defendants have not received the plaintiffs responses to their discovery j
request, Defendants ’ First Set Of interrogatories And Request F or Production OfDocun1ents T 0
Plointqfs which was mailed to them on August I3, 2003. In accordance with Local Rule of
Civil Procedure Rule 37, counsel for the defendants is attempting to resolve this issue without
judicial intervention. Counsel for the defendants has been diligently working on the motion for
l
summary judgment. However, without the plaintiffs’ responses to the defendaIIts’ discovery
w
nequests, the defendants are not able to meet the current deadline for summary judgment. l
fhereforeg the defendants are requesting an additional sixty (60) days to enable the plaintiffs to
Pr . ·l_ `]`." J
```‘ _ respondto the defendantS’ discovery requests and for defendants’ counsel to finalize the motion
“;f j ‘‘j‘ l
1*** S““*“‘nt"j“dg“‘°“‘· ¤¤¤•¤nnn=a¤ to i
` ‘f°"‘*`.*`"°"f{l’ 7 .l·;°i
• _ W E
l
· l
reameiacrr Iz; 4 ,. D;
TF V ·-; I, A - . . , E-; I Q Attt-

*7-L -. 7. .
7- _- i_ if __ __ ?i ’· = `_‘ . ' ”*"T*-‘T;—¢——-
-—-————-— ..... ji] jig Fi F I T n ---e e-- e
—— ew · ct- _- -e -. .. . < -‘‘‘

El »- -. .
_i 7, __ __ ?i ?i ‘ — `·;‘ ‘·· . _ ’ ’*·"<—¤—=———
- _ 7 C; E1-_"` 2§;;;i:;.:;.:;;>;·>;r-+.?.;;;L L L , _ __ Ei- EC '“‘ __- -- - KA. -LL___