Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1 *F";—un'__—__HY_""—`—“`h"`_""P`_—"m`"—`i”`"'*'“—"""_““ —*“""“*"····——·*·‘········ —·--·-—;·-·--.-..;
_· Case 3:02-cv-O21O1C»%VC Document 23 Filed 02/12/2004 Page 1 of 1
1 Q 096%)/ 0/ xt/#1/(ky!
I ?Y“ 1 € e1e`1 > , "~
I UNITED STATES nisTRie#rkyg5r5Ri =1 e·e;
1 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT? .1.. ,,1_ .. I
‘ ‘ ;·, ~_¤”-» L- Ei 1
='f‘ if J :’l_L,f» Y1 `··—·—<-·
1 CYNTHIA WELFARE ; CIVIL ACTION No. L 'x· I
1 Pf¤m¢w’ z 3:02CV2l0l (Ave) A
I PETER O'MEARA, COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL :
1 RETARDATION ;
1 Ddendant 1 FEBRUARY 10, 2004 I
1 JOINT MOTION FOR AN EXPANSION OF DISCOVERY AND PRE-TRIAL

1 DEADLINES
Pursuant to Rule 9(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, Discovery in the above-
captioned matter is set to close on February 1 1, 2004. The parties hereby request an additional
ninety days to complete discovery, and ask that the other pre-trial deadlines in this matter be
siniilarlydextended.
' WP; _P' the third request for an expansion of the discovery period and pre-trial deadlines. 1
§ lj ' V . :1]
es ’ YE Theparties--have been pursing the litigation in good faith, having both served discovery requests,
Q I includingfth defendant’s request dated January 20, 2004. In addition, the defendant filed a
" 15 ji `
¢ ‘ Q', motion to dismiss on Septemberl8, 2003 which the plaintiff has opposed with the tiling of brief
• Q: Q)
E c: § in opposition on November 20, 2003. (The court has not yet ruled on the motion.) The
l
g J; *`·==$ undersigned counsel for the defendant hereby represents that he conferred with counsel for the
"G
qi E plaintiff by telephone on February 9, 2004 and has been authorized to tile this motion on behalf
O ·—•
8 Q: of both parties.
2 ;§, ‘ Wherefore the parties hereby request that the court expand all existing pre-trial deadlines .
aa
as ru
IQ E3] by ninety days so that: I
E E
_¤ 1
ru o
E. m I
‘==·‘ T==+-··~.=~- --a .-a . ra, .,-._,-_;_,T_,:g,_;_5;¢_L;1;_ééw