Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

74 7 ` .,.. I .` ...,,,,,,....t_....; j.._ ..............__......_....__....;._.._..-.. ,.,,,,,,,,,._____________,,________________
Case 3:02-cv-02100-DJS Document 28 Filed 06/21/2004 Page 1 of 3 {
O Ct)
·== I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A i
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT \ `
“lM\\ JUN 2 ·
I i Q-» I gi CQFQRY
CORINR CARR = ‘} $.3*-;`»{-E-iz": Q Y
: 2`}J;§.·`=`a' ;_,n¤·-·
Plaintiff :
j V. 2 DOCKET NO. 3:O2CV210O (DJS)
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Q
Defendant : JUNE 18, 2004 I
THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE AND COMPLIANCE TO THE
DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND, MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF
. 1
‘ The Plaintiff in the above-captioned action hereby moves for sum-
mary judgment, in favor of the Plaintiff, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
Q 56(a). In support of this motion, the Plaintiff declare that
i there are no genuine issues of material fact requiring a trial
é and that the Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment as a mat-
? ter of law. The Plaintiff is relying on the fruits of recently
l discovered evidences that supports and resolves the Plaintiff's l
Complaint and motions. K
- . 1
` The Plaintiff's memorandum of laws are attached, with exhibits,
Q and Local Rule 9(c)1 Statement in support of this motion. I
1
_ ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED i
" I

I
Case 3:02-cv-O210 I
! The Plaintiff's Memorandum of Laws in Support of the PLaintiff's 1
Motion for Summary Judgment:
S 1. Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56. Summary Judgment
I (a) For Claimant. A party seeking to recover upon a claim, coun-
E terclaim, or cross-claim or to obtain a declaratory judgment may,
I at any time after the expiration of 20 days from the commencement
I of the action or after service of a motion for summary judgment
l by the adverse party, move with or without supporting affidavits
i for a summary judgment in the party's favor upon all or any part
l thereof.
I
I
I
I
I
i_`___L____________; _ ____________. .... -_ ........... .... . .... . . .

n
_ Case 3:02-cv—O210(?»l%JS Document 28 Filed 06/21%%)O4 Page30f3 J
: .... xl
1
) PLAINTIFF/PR0 SE (
i ; ¤Q,,,‘, QM 4
Q BY
\ Corine Carr
!

i CERTIFICATION
3
I, Corine Carr, the Plaintiff/pro se, certify that a copy of The
Plaintiff's Response and Compliance to The Defendant's Opposition
` to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and, Motion for Sum-
mary Judgment in Favor of The Plaintiff was mailed to:
Attorney Anthony T. Rice
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
United States Postal Service
Northeast Area Law Office
8 Griffin Road North
Windsor, CT. 06006-0170
(860) 285-7098
` E~Mail:anthony.t.rice.usps.gov
Connecticut Federal Bar No. ct22474 )
{
Dated; June 18, 2004
PLAINTIFF/PR0 ss

Corine Carr
42 Goodyear Street
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
(203) 785-9495
3