Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I I
ase 3:02-cv-02008-SRU Document 60 Filed O3/16/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
I
I rsh aztec I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Zllllll MAR [0 A U 2-I I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
as. aisrmcr I
....................................I....I............ X BIHUGEPQR]: Egg? I
THOMAS SABELLA and : I
KAREN SABELLA, Z
1 Civil Action N0.
Plaintiff : 3 :02CV2008 (SRU)(IIBF)
-against—
NORTHEAST GENERATION I
SERVICES COMPANY and z I
NORTHEAST UTILITIES, : I
Defendants. MARCH 9, 2004 I
--—- - ---------------------——-—-—-—-——-—---——---------- x I
g l··-·-
X Q do IV§§ION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
§ LL! ( OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE GRANT APPRAISAL I
QE ‘ I
E 9-'EPursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 6 b and Local Rule 9 b
\\ I-- ( )> .
I LI. 5 degrgants hereby move for an extension of time to file their memorandum of law in I
I g :5m
I he opposition to plaintiffs’ motion to strike the appraisal of Arnold Grant, through and
including March I6, 2004. Defendants require additional time to file their I
memorandum because counsel are working to resolve at least a portion of the motion
§ without court intervention. Plaintiffs’ counsel consents to the requested extension.
I
2 ig I I
CD ¤
5
2 ` I
’ I
S I
5 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED I
§ TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED I
§ g {N07l524l}
CARMODY & TORRANCE tu 5OLeavenwort11Street
Attorneys at Law Pos: Office Box 1110 '
Waterbury, CT 06721-1110
Telephone; 205 573-[200 I
giii-ai xi Ri
A .. A ... ... __. __. __ iiiiiii II I ii-I I i I I I I I I
-III I I _i.. IEEE"?
i‘` "`T’?“”f‘ I- Iei`i -=-—-~—- -—-- » e-e» i`i`i
--A .. A ... I I __ I __i piiiiii III ITT i I I I I I I I
._._____ as =_i _=.=