Free Statement of Material Facts - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:02-cv—01960-Eg Document 51 Filed 06/07/20% Page 1 of 4
Jtttt 7 lti tit} Witt
L:. ti-1__*i.|;‘i.‘: lets.: matte? A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT M W mi".? i'* *3 ’-/iiii»
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
SEAN A. LOVE : CASE NO. 302C\/1960(EBB) ;
Plaintiff : é
V. :
TOWN OF GRANBY, DOUGLAS CLARKI i
and ROBERT CASTLE :
Defendants z JUNE 4, 2004
PLAINTIFF’S LOCAL RULE 9g2[2 STATEMENT l
PART A. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ STATE OF FACTS
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
I
4. Admitted. '
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted. I
9. Admitted. i
I
10. Admitted.
ll. Admitted.
12. Admitted.
13. Denied. It was more than “a Terry pat d0wn."

____________________________________________________________ __|

1
Case 3:02-cv—O1960-Eglg Document 51 Filed 06/07/ZG? Page 2 of 4
1
14. Admitted. E
15. Admitted. I
16. Admitted, but I call it a field sobriety test. I
17. Denied.
18. Admitted.
19. Admitted.
20. Admitted.
`
21. Admitted.
22. Admitted. Q
23. Admitted.
24. Admitted.
PART B. ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT
1. Whether in fact Officer Clark grabbed plaintiffs scrotum and said, "You X
haven’t been felt like this in a long time, you faggot." Plaintiffs Exhibit A.
2. Whether Officer Clark called plaintiff a "fagg0t.” Plaintiffs Exh. A.
3. Whether defendant officers led plaintiff to believe that he had been
arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. Plaintiffs Exh. A.
4. Whether defendant officers gave plaintiff a breathalyzer test at the police
station. Plaintiffs Exhibit A.
1
5. Whether defendant officers intimidated plaintiff at the police station.
Plaintiff s Exhibit A.
I

_.___m_________......____._..i

Case 3:02-cv—O1960-I? Document 51 Filed 06/07/2?0¤4\ Page 3 of 4 ‘
...- \_M/
1
l
l
l
6. Whether defendant Castle was properly supervising defendant Clark on I
November 11, 2000. Plaintiff s Exhibits A, C, D and E. i
I
7. Whether defendant Town of Granby’s prior attempts to discipline *
defendant Clark were serious and adequate Plaintiffs Exhibits D and E,. K
8. Whether defendant Town of Granby had a "hands off’ policy with respect
to operation of its police department. Plaintiff" s Exhibits D and E.
PLAINTIFF
B . .
ih
tr ats . Renzul •
65 Elm Street, P O. Box 718 I
Winsted, CT 06098 l
860-279-Qsss
Fed. Bar No. CT 11058

l
l


I
l
Case 3:02-cv—O1960-REB) Document 51 Filed 06/07/2% Page 4 of 4
!

CERTIFICATION lé 5 4- N
I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing was mailed on to
counsel as follows:
l
Attorney Frank Szilagyi l
Silvester & Daly l
72 Russ Street l
Hartford, CT 06106
AEM}; ¤ J
I , JV I ·
y . Renzu o I
mmissioner fthe Supe ior Court
l
l
l