Free Order on Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 79.1 kB
Pages: 1
Date: February 23, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 513 Words, 3,210 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20119/24.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum - District Court of Connecticut ( 79.1 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum - District Court of Connecticut
In- -h1- AAMw.¤»Ims»;»;:..,.,-_ = =—- -I·- —-; >—4 ;E».,. 4 .. .. . 4MArM,. ,;- A S
I ??_sIj_?ij>fEYi. !t 1 ‘’‘·`‘ _`¤’i --A-- *’=` *-‘ ‘*¤‘¤·> *¤;;é·; —».v * ·‘» -·¤·r— · ~- —
I S A Q `Du{I'€•~I¢ 5 '•
22q”f' Q UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (91 ] yyy§_l
QII · FOR THE ch
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
EI ~IR
I0 UE AUGUSTE#260549 I
I` EETITIONER - -
! _ . _ , ~ " ' #
STBINGE €g_ 31_ _ _V - 8:O2CV1922(R.N.C)
RES ONDENT III .. - Q_
- M COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ILLEGAL DETNTION.
I I . I I
II NOW*COMES*THE·PETITIONER(JOSUE AUGUSTE)FURTHER KNOWN AS THE PETITIONER
DOI EREBY PETITIONS THIS HONORABLE COURT TO REMEDY HIS UNLAWFUL DETENTION AND
TOE NJOIN HIS CONTINUED UNLAWFUL DETENTION BY THE RESPONDENTS. IN SUPPORT OF
THE PETITION AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF;PETITIONER_ALLEGES AS FOLLOW.
` l
.I (1) PETITIONER IS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SER ICE(PHYSICAL)I,N.S DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF CONNECTICUT. HE IS DETAINED AT
csp RN CORRETIONAL INSTITUTE IN SOMERS CONNECTICUT.RESPONDENT I.N.S HAS CON—
TRA TED WITH OSBORN CORRECTIONAL TO HOUSE IMMIGRATION DETAINEES SUCH AS THE I
PET rxomzn.
I .
I (2)THIS ACTION ARISES UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND I
THE IMMIGRATION AND NAT10NAL1TY AcT("INA"),8 u.S.c §1101 at Seq., AS AMENDED I
BYT E ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996 (IIRIRA) PUB.
L. 0. 104-208,110 STAT. 1570 AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT("APA"),
5U. .C §701 ct Seq THIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION UNDER 28 U.S.C §22A1, art.I§9
CL.§ OF THE UNITED STATES c0NST1TuT10N ("SUSPENSION CLAUSE"),AND 28 U.S.C §
133 w AS THE PETITIONER IS PRESENTLY IN CUSTODY UNDER COLOR OF THE AUTHORITY I
OF IRE UNITED STATES ,AND SUCH CUSTODY IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION, I
LAWS OR TREATIES OF THE UNITED STATES. see ZADVYDAS V. DAVIS,5J3 U.S 678,121
THIS COURT MAY GRANT RELIEF PERSUANT TO 28 U.S.C § 2241,5 U.S.C
S » I, E ALL WRITS ACT 28 U.S.C §1651 I
VENUE I
I VENUE LIES IN THE UNITED STATES DISRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF E
gO?§EgII§UT THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH THE PETITIONER RESIDES 28 U.S.C
5 I •
_ N_ E PARTIES I I
I Fegruary 18, 2004. Au uste v. Stran e; 3:O2CV1922 (RNC}
I
l ReI Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc.# 20] up- I
DeIied. Petitioner's complaint foxk;nIDnci§ve ityégi I
hii detention by the respondent an t ere gretical Claims Hg thgké ag Ited
wr t of habeas corpus. The motion raises i en ipx Cnlg i§? the
· I - ‘ ' : tly pending before Conrt oIaNpp§g ,·
§;I;§§ g§§§§?i therefore must be dlSmlSS€@w§I§QgJ28 II'_ UE%.C- S
22IB. So Ordered. Yrfi "U gig
SER? tv w'
L RQ Og
I Ro . ign , .S.D.J.'“
I - --»—..· ·»·.¢·¤¢•.»·..» x..u;.u.·—\U01;. .L!‘1I1, UI‘I‘11»NC>E»
_TYTTTT???ii3?j*D***{SSSESSETTFEEEIEESEETEEETTITIIIIIiTIIii;T;;{§IQQSTISSSSEISSIIILQIIIL