Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:02-cv-01920-IVIRK Document 114-6 Filed 10/24/2003 Page 1 013

Case 3:02-cv-01920-IVIRK Docurmrw r 0/24/2003 Page 2 of 3
I .
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
S FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
2
3
No. 3:O2CV1920
4
5
6 DUNKIN' DONUTS INCORPORATED AND
DUNKIN' DONUTS USA, INC.
7
VS
8
4 DONUTS, INC., GRANDO, INC., GLENN STETZER, KATHLEEN ·
9 STETZER, GEORGE GERMANO AND JAM S MCMANAMA
10
11
12
13
14 Deposition of: GLENN STETZER, taken before
15 Barbara L. Murphy, Licensed Shorthand Reporter,
16 License No. 305 and Notary Public within and for the
17 State of Connecticut, held at the offices of Shipman
18 and Goodwin, One American Row, Hartford, Connecticut
19 on October 13, 2003 commencing at 9:05 a.m.
20 .
21
22 f
23
24
25
Spherion Deposition Services Q
212 490 3430

Case 3:02-cv-01920-IVIRK Document 114-6 Filed 10/24/2003 Page 3 of 3
202
1 A. I do not.
2 Q. Other than Aroma's Coffee -— let me make j
3 sure I understand this.
4 Aroma's Coffee is located in the Citgo
5 gas station; is that correct?
6 M . GILMORE: Objection as to form.
7 THE WITNESS: I'm not sure but I think
8 so.
9 Q. (By Mr. Karlin) Did you have any reason to
10 believe that the doughnuts were staying at the Citgo
11 gas station rather than being delivered to Aroma's?
12 M . ORDER: Objection to form.
13 THE WITNESS: I thought it was a Citgo ·
14 gas station until recently.
15 Q. (By Mr. Karlin) Now do you have a different
16 understanding?
17 A. It looked like it was Aroma's, yeah.
18 Q. When you say it looked like Aroma's --
19 A. It looked like a bakery sign on the outside
20 of the building.
21 Q. And are you —— is your doughnut business
22 currently supplying the Citgo gas station?
23 A. No. _
24 Q. Why is that?
25 A. When I found out about it, I stopped it.
Sphexion Deposition Services
2124903430